Potential methods for geothermal-based hydrogen production

被引:70
作者
Balta, M. Tolga [2 ]
Dincer, Ibrahim [1 ]
Hepbasli, Arif [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ontario, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Inst Technol, Oshawa, ON L1H 7K4, Canada
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Fac Engn, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Energy; Exergy; Efficiency; Hydrogen production; Geothermal; Thermochemical cycles; Hybrid cycles; Electrolysis; TEMPERATURE STEAM ELECTROLYSIS; POWER-PLANT; THERMOCHEMICAL HYDROGEN; ENERGY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEMS; EXERGY; HEAT; TURKEY; WATER;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.09.040
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
In this study, four potential methods are identified for geothermal-based hydrogen production, namely, (i) directly from the geothermal steam, (ii) through conventional water electrolysis using the electricity generated from geothermal power plant, (iii) using both geothermal heat and electricity for high temperature steam electrolysis and/or hybrid processes, (iv) using the heat available from geothermal resource in thermochemical processes to disassociate water into hydrogen and oxygen. Here we focus on relatively low-temperature thermochemical and hybrid cycles, due to their greater application possibility, and examine them as a potential option for hydrogen production using geothermal heat. We also present a brief thermodynamic analysis to assess their performance through energy and exergy efficiencies for comparison purposes. The results show that these cycles have good potential and become attractive due to the overall system efficiencies over 50%. The copper-chlorine cycle is identified as a highly promising cycle for geothermal hydrogen production. Furthermore, three types of industrial electrolysis methods, which are generally considered for hydrogen production currently, are also discussed and compared with the above mentioned cycles. (C) 2009 Professor T. Nejat Veziroglu. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:4949 / 4961
页数:13
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   LOW-TEMPERATURE THERMAL PROCESS FOR DECOMPOSITION OF WATER [J].
ABRAHAM, BM ;
SCHREINER, F .
SCIENCE, 1973, 180 (4089) :959-960
[2]  
*AER GEN NUCL SAN, 1965, CES WAT HYDR PROD PR
[3]   HYDROGEN ENERGY: TERCEIRA ISLAND DEMONSTRATION FACILITY [J].
Alves, Mario .
CHEMICAL INDUSTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 2008, 14 (02) :77-95
[4]  
Amason B, 2003, 2 GERM HYDR C ESS FE
[5]  
[Anonymous], HYDR EC OPP COSTS BA
[6]   NEW CONCEPTS IN HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION IN ICELAND [J].
ARNASON, B ;
SIGFUSSON, TI ;
JONSSON, VK .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 1993, 18 (11) :915-919
[7]   Thermodynamic assessment of geothermal energy use in hydrogen production [J].
Balta, M. Tolga ;
Dincer, Ibrahim ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2009, 34 (07) :2925-2939
[8]  
BALTA MT, 2009, INT J ENERG RES, V34, P757, DOI DOI 10.1002/ER.1589
[9]  
BALTA MT, 2009, P 4 INT EX EN ENV S