Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents - Part 3: IDAC operator response model

被引:45
作者
Chang, Y. H. J. [1 ]
Mosleh, A.
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Ctr Risk & Reliabil, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Paul Scherrer Inst, CH-5232 Villigen, PSI, Switzerland
关键词
human reliability analysis; performance influencing factors; performance shaping factors; cognitive; dynamic probabilistic risk assessment;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2006.05.013
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This is the third in a series of five papers describing the IDAC (Information, Decision, and Action in Crew context) model for human reliability analysis. An example application of this modeling technique is also discussed in this series. The model is developed to probabilistically predict the responses of the nuclear power plant control room operating crew in accident conditions. The operator response spectrum includes cognitive, emotional, and physical activities during the course of an accident. This paper discusses the modeling components and their process rules. An operator's problem-solving process is divided into three types: information preprocessing (I), diagnosis and decision-making (D), and action execution (A). Explicit and context-dependent behavior rules for each type of operator are developed in the form of tables, and logical or mathematical relations. These regulate the process and activities of each of the three types of response. The behavior rules are developed for three generic types of operator: Decision Maker, Action Taker, and Consultant. This paper also provides a simple approach to calculating normalized probabilities of alternative behaviors given a context. (C) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1060
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, VARIETIES ATTENTION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1984, STRESS APPRASIAL COP
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1973, VISUAL INFORM PROCES
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1995, OXFORD PSYCHOL SERIE
[5]  
Baddeley A. D., 1986, WORKING MEMORY
[6]   Elements for designing a self-correcting organisation: Examples from nuclear power plants [J].
Bourrier, M .
SAFETY MANAGEMENT: THE CHALLENGE OF CHANGE, 1998, :133-147
[7]  
CHANG YH, 2000, SOC RISK AN 2000 ANN
[8]  
CHANG YHJ, 2006, IN PRESS RELIAB ENG
[9]  
CHANG YHJ, 2002, INT TOP M PROB SAF A
[10]  
CHANG YHJ, 1999, CTRSB606 U MAR