Proprioceptive abilities in patients with conservative and surgical treatment of ACL tears

In the present study we evaluated proprioceptive capabilities of the knee joint with a balance test and correlated these findings to parameters which document mechanical stability. We compared 8 conservatively treated and 12 surgically treated patients with ACL-deficient knee joints with a control group of 12 subjects. The balance test was performed with a Kistler force plate. Both the conservatively treated and the surgically treated patients showed significantly higher deviations of their centre of gravity than the control group. This was true not only for the injured leg but also for the noninjured contralateral leg. The differences were most remarkable when comparing the entire distance of centre of gravity deviations during 10 s. Additionally, the conservatively treated patients interrupted the test procedure significantly more frequently than the other two groups. We were not able to document any correlation between proprioceptive function and parameters for joint stability such as anterior drawer, Lachman, pivot shift and KT-1000 measurements. Clinical significance: In patients with conservatively or surgically treated ACL tears the rehabilitation of proprioceptive capabilities is mandatory both for the injured leg and for the noninjured contralateral leg in order to restore the function of the lower extremities. Reconstruction of passive stability alone is not sufficient.