Evaluation of aortoiliac aneurysm before endovascular repair: Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with multidetector row computed tomographic angiography with an automated analysis software tool

被引:36
作者
Lutz, AM
Willmann, JK
Pfammatter, T
Lachat, M
Wildermuth, S
Marincek, B
Weishaupt, D
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost Hosp, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Cardiovasc Surg Clin, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mva.2003.143
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess accuracy and reliability of a volumetric analysis of abdominal aneurysms on the basis of multidetector row computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with a commercially available automated vessel analysis software program. Materials and methods: Twenty patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms underwent preoperative CTA and MRA before endovascular repair. Postdeployment CTA was performed in 15 of these 20 patients (75%). All preoperative CTA and MRA and postdeployment CTA data sets were analyzed with an automated software tool. The length of the stent grafts on postdeployment CTA was measured and compared with the true length of the primary component. Two readers independently evaluated 13 vessel parameters on preoperative CTA and MRA, which are considered to be important in planning stent graft deployment. Results: With the automated analysis software tool, all measurements could be performed on either CTA or MRA data sets. There was no statistically significant difference between postdeployment measurements of stent graft length on CTA and the true dimensions of the implanted stent grafts. Interobserver agreement for all of the measurements with either CTA or MRA was good to excellent (interclass coefficient, 0.71 to 0.99) with only minimal mean differences of measured dimensions between both readers (range, -2.0 to +2.3 mm, Bland-Altman). Intermodality agreement between CTA and MRA was good to excellent (interclass coefficient, 0.62 to 0.98) with small mean differences of measured dimensions between both methods (range, -4.1 to +2.1 mm, Bland-Altman). Conclusion: Volumetric measurement with an automated analysis software tool allows a fast, precise, and reliable noninvasive preoperative determination of all aortic dimensions on the basis of either CTA or MRA data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:619 / 627
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Abdominal aortic aneurysm measurements for endovascular repair: Intra- and interobserver variability of CT measurements
    Aarts, NJM
    Schurink, GWH
    Kool, LJS
    Bode, PJ
    van Baalen, JM
    Hermans, J
    van Bockel, JH
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 18 (06) : 475 - 480
  • [2] Aneurysm-related death: Primary endpoint analysis for comparison of open and endovascular repair
    Arko, FR
    Lee, WA
    Hill, BB
    Olcott, C
    Dalman, RL
    Harris, EJ
    Cipriano, P
    Fogarty, TJ
    Zarins, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 36 (02) : 297 - 304
  • [3] BASKIN KM, 1996, RADIOLOGY, V201, P317
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms
    Blum, U
    Voshage, G
    Lammer, J
    Beyersdorf, F
    Tollner, D
    Kretschmer, G
    Spillner, G
    Polterauer, P
    Nagel, G
    Holzenbein, T
    Thurnher, S
    Langer, M
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (01) : 13 - 20
  • [6] Impact of exclusion criteria on patient selection for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Carpenter, JP
    Baum, RA
    Barker, CF
    Golden, MA
    Mitchell, ME
    Velazquez, OC
    Fairman, RM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 34 (06) : 1050 - 1054
  • [7] Identifying and grading factors that modify the outcome of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Chaikof, EL
    Fillinger, MF
    Matsumura, JS
    Rutherford, RB
    White, GH
    Blankensteijn, JD
    Bernhard, VM
    Harris, PL
    Kent, KC
    May, J
    Veith, FJ
    Zarins, CK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (05) : 1061 - 1066
  • [8] Angiography for preoperative evaluation in patients with lower gastrointestinal bleeding - Are the benefits worth the risks?
    Cohn, SM
    Moller, BA
    Zieg, PM
    Milner, KA
    Angood, PB
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 1998, 133 (01) : 50 - 55
  • [9] Fillinger M F, 2000, Semin Vasc Surg, V13, P247
  • [10] Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: Comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography
    Hany, TF
    Debatin, JF
    Leung, DA
    Pfammatter, T
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1997, 204 (02) : 357 - 362