Neurostimulation in ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block: A prospective randomized trial

被引:94
作者
Dingemans, Emmanuel
Williams, Stephan R.
Arcand, Genevieve
Chouinard, Philippe
Harris, Patrick
Ruel, Monique
Girard, Francois
机构
[1] Hop Notre Dame de Bon Secours, CHU Montreal, Dept Anesthesiol, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
[2] Hop Notre Dame de Bon Secours, CHU Montreal, Dept Surg, Montreal, PQ H2L 4M1, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1213/01.ane.0000226101.63736.20
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Ultrasound guidance (USG) for infraclavicular blocks provides real time visualization of the advancing needle and local anesthetic distribution. Whether visualization of local anesthetic spread can supplant neurostimulation as the end point for local anesthetic injection during USG block has never been formally evaluated. Therefore, for this prospective randomized study, we recruited 72 patients scheduled for hand or forearm surgery and compared the speed of execution and quality USG infraclavicular block with either USG alone (Group U) or USG combined wit neurostimulation (Group S). In Group U, local anesthetic was deposited in a U-shaped distribution posterior and to each side of the axillary artery using as few injections as possible (1, 2, and 3 injections in 29, 6, and 3 patients, respectively). In Group S, a single injection was made after obtaining a distal motor response with a stimulating current between 0.3 and 0.6 mA. The anesthetic solution consisted of 0.5 mL/kg of lidocaine 1.5%, bupivacaine 0.125%, and epinephrine 1:200 000 (final concentrations). Procedure times were significantly shorter in Group U compared with Group S (3.1 +/- 1.6 min and 5.2 +/- 4.7 min, respectively; P = 0.006). In Group S, anesthetic spread was mainly anterior to the axillary artery in 37% of patients and mainly posterior in 63% of patients. Thirty minutes after the injection, 86% of patients in Group U had complete sensory block in the musculocutaneous, median, radial, and ulnar nerve territories compared with 57% in Group S (P = 0.007). Patients blocked in Group U with a single injection had the same rate of complete block (86%) as those blocked with more than one injection (86%). Block supplementation rates were 8% in Group U versus 26% in Group S (P = 0.049). Block failure occurred in one patient in Group S because of an inability to obtain a distal stimulation after 20 min. We conclude that USG infraclavicular block is more rapidly performed and yields a higher success rate when visualization of local anesthetic spread is used as the end point for injection. Posterolateral spread of local anesthetic around the axillary artery predicts successful block, circumventing the need for direct nerve visualization.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1280
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular versus supraclavicular block [J].
Arcand, GV ;
Williams, SR ;
Chouinard, P ;
Boudreault, D ;
Harris, P ;
Ruel, M ;
Girard, F .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2005, 101 (03) :886-890
[2]   Efficiency of secondary posterior trunk single stimulation, low volume infraclavicular plexus block for upper limb surgery [J].
Bloc, S ;
Garnier, T ;
Komly, B ;
Leclerc, P ;
Mercadal, L ;
Morel, B ;
Dhonneur, G .
ANNALES FRANCAISES D ANESTHESIE ET DE REANIMATION, 2005, 24 (11-12) :1329-1333
[3]   At the cords, the pinkie towards: Interpreting infraclavicular motor responses to neurostimulation [J].
Borene, SC ;
Edwards, JN ;
Boezaart, AP .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2004, 29 (02) :125-129
[4]   An evaluation of the infraclavicular block via a modified approach of the Raj technique [J].
Borgeat, A ;
Ekatodramis, G ;
Dumont, C .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 93 (02) :436-441
[5]   Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [J].
Chan, VWS ;
Perlas, A ;
Rawson, R ;
Odukoya, O .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2003, 97 (05) :1514-1517
[6]   Peripheral nerve stimulation in the practice of brachial plexus anesthesia:: A review [J].
De Andrés, J ;
Sala-Blanch, X .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2001, 26 (05) :478-483
[7]   A comparison of a single-stimulation lateral infraclavicular plexus block with a triple-stimulation axillary block [J].
Deleuze, A ;
Gentili, ME ;
Marret, E ;
Lamonerie, L ;
Bonnet, F .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2003, 28 (02) :89-94
[8]  
Desroches T, 2003, CAN J ANAESTH, V50, P253, DOI 10.1007/BF03017794
[9]   Infraclavicular plexus block: Multiple injection versus single injection [J].
Gaertner, E ;
Estebe, JP ;
Zamfir, A ;
Cuby, C ;
Macaire, P .
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2002, 27 (06) :590-594
[10]   Ultrasonographic assessment of topographic anatomy in volunteers suggests a modification of the infraclavicular vertical brachial plexus block [J].
Greher, M ;
Retzl, G ;
Niel, P ;
Kamolz, L ;
Marhofer, P ;
Kapral, S .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (05) :632-636