An alternative measure of relative education to explain voter turnout

被引:40
作者
Tenn, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Fed Trade Commiss, Washington, DC 20580 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00317.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Nie, Junn, and Stehlik-Barry (1996) develop a theory in which relative, rather than absolute education determines political participation. Empirical tests of this theory have been unable to isolate the effect of education from other factors that impact participation. We propose an alternative definition in which education is measured relative to those born in the same year. This is used to estimate a model of voter turnout that controls for both absolute and relative education. The results show that this new measure of relative education has far more explanatory power than does absolute education. This finding has significant implications regarding how education affects both aggregate voter turnout levels and inequality in voter participation.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 282
页数:12
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
Anthony Downs., 1957, An economic theory of democracy
[2]  
BENNETT SE, 1991, SOC SCI QUART, V72, P314
[3]  
Blau FD, 1998, J ECON LIT, V36, P112
[4]   A 2-STAGE ESTIMATOR FOR PROBIT MODELS WITH STRUCTURAL GROUP EFFECTS [J].
BORJAS, GJ ;
SUEYOSHI, GT .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1994, 64 (1-2) :165-182
[5]  
Brody RichardA., 1978, The New American Political System, P287
[6]  
Card D., 1999, HDB LABOR EC, V3, P1801, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4463(99)03011-4
[7]   SIMPLE EXPLANATIONS OF TURNOUT DECLINE [J].
CASSEL, CA ;
LUSKIN, RC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1988, 82 (04) :1321-1330
[8]  
Converse P., 1972, HUMAN MEANING SOCIAL
[9]  
Greene W. H., 1997, Econometric Analysis, V3rd ed.
[10]   SAMPLE SELECTION BIAS AS A SPECIFICATION ERROR [J].
HECKMAN, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (01) :153-161