New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis

被引:102
作者
Lafage, Virginie [1 ]
Gangnet, Nicolas
Senegas, Jacques
Lavaste, Francois
Skalli, Wafa
机构
[1] Biomech Lab, Paris, France
[2] Univ Bordeaux 1, Ctr Hosp, Hop Pellegrin, Serv Chirurg Orthoped & Reparat, Bordeaux, France
[3] Univ Bordeaux 1, Ctr Hosp, Hop Pellegrin, Unite Pathol Rachidienne, Bordeaux, France
[4] Ctr Aquat Dos, Clin Ct Martin, Pessac, France
关键词
lumbar spine; destabilized spine; interspinous; instrumentation; biomechanics; finite element model;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0b013e3180b9f429
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A combined in vitro and finite-element analysis was completed to assess the biomechanical effect of a new interspinous implant on the lumbar spine. Objective. The aim was to investigate the effect of an interspinous implant on the biomechanical behavior of a vertebral segment. Methods. An in vitro study on L3 -L5 segments from fresh human cadavers was conducted combined with a 3-dimensional finite-element analysis. Intact, injured, and instrumented states of L4 -L5 were compared loaded in flexion-extension, lateral-bending, and torsion. The evaluated implant is an interspinous spacer fixed to the spine by 2 polyester braids looped around the proximal and distal spinous. Results. The effect of the implant appeared mainly in flexion-extension: experimental results showed reduced range of motion of the instrumented spine regarding the injured and intact one; and finite-element analysis indicated a decrease of disc stresses and increase of loads transmitted to the spinous processes. Conclusion. In this in vitro and finite-element analysis, the role of the new interspinous implant appeared to reduce motion without suppressing it and to lower stress in the disc fibers and anulus matrix. Further in vivo investigations are necessary to draw definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:1706 / 1713
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]
ADAMS MA, 1996, INSTRUMENTED FUSION
[2]
[Anonymous], CLIN BIOMECHANICS SP
[3]
BERNARD P, 1994, THESIS BORDEAUX FRAN
[4]
Bertagnoli R, 2002, SPINAL RESTABILIZATION PROCEDURES: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC ASPECTS OF INTERVERTEBRAL FUSION CAGES, ARTIFICIAL DISCS AND MOBILE IMPLANTS, P365
[5]
CAVAGNA R, 1995, RACHIS, V7, P283
[6]
COHEN R, 1992, THESIS MONTPELLIER F
[7]
INTRAOPERATIVE MEASUREMENT OF LUMBAR SPINAL INSTABILITY [J].
EBARA, S ;
HARADA, T ;
HOSONO, N ;
INOUE, M ;
TANAKA, M ;
MORIMOTO, Y ;
ONO, K .
SPINE, 1992, 17 (03) :S44-S50
[8]
Risk factors for adjacent-segment failure following lumbar fixation with rigid instrumentation for degenerative instability [J].
Etebar, S ;
Cahill, DW .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 1999, 90 (04) :163-169
[9]
Dynamic neutralisation of the lumbar spine confirmed on a new lumbar spine simulator in vitro [J].
Freudiger, S ;
Dubois, G ;
Lorrain, M .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1999, 119 (3-4) :127-132
[10]
Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional stereoradiographic study using a force platform [J].
Gangnet, N ;
Pomero, V ;
Dumas, R ;
Skalli, W ;
Vital, JM .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2003, 25 (5-6) :424-433