Weight training of the thigh muscles using closed vs. open kinetic chain exercises: A comparison of performance enhancement

被引:88
作者
Augustsson, J
Esko, A
Thomee, R
Svantesson, U
机构
[1] Gothenburg Univ, Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Rehabil Med, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Neurol, S-41345 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Gothenburg Coll Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil, Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
resistance training; free weights; weight machines; lower extremity;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.1998.27.1.3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Resistance training is commonly used in sports for prevention of injuries and in rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to compare closed vs. open kinetic chain weight training of the thigh muscles and to determine which mode resulted in the greatest performance enhancement. Twenty-four healthy subjects were randomized into a barbell squat or a knee extension and hip adduction variable resistance weight machine group and performed maximal, progressive weight training twice a week for 6 weeks. All subjects were tested prior to training and at the completion of the training period. A barbell squat 3-repetition maximum, an isokinetic knee extension 1-repetition maximum, and a vertical jump test were used to monitor effects of training. Significant improvements were seen in both groups in the barbell squat 3-repetition maximum test. The closed kinetic chain group improved 23 kg (31%), which was significantly more than the 12 kg (13%) seen in the open kinetic chain group. In the vertical jump test, the closed kinetic chain group improved significantly 5 cm (10%), while no significant changes were seen in the open kinetic chain group. A large increase of training load was observed in both subject groups; however, improvements in isotonic strength did not transfer to the isokinetic knee extension test. The results may be explained by neural adaptation, weight training mode, and specificity of tests.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 8
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   STRENGTH AND POWER ASSESSMENT - ISSUES, CONTROVERSIES AND CHALLENGES [J].
ABERNETHY, P ;
WILSON, G ;
LOGAN, P .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1995, 19 (06) :401-417
[2]  
ADAMS G, 1992, J APPL PHYSIOL, V74, P1578
[3]   MAPPING OF ELECTRICAL MUSCLE STIMULATION USING MRI [J].
ADAMS, GR ;
HARRIS, RT ;
WOODARD, D ;
DUDLEY, GA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 74 (02) :532-537
[4]   EFFECTS OF ECCENTRIC AND CONCENTRIC MUSCLE ACTIONS IN RESISTANCE TRAINING [J].
COLLIANDER, EB ;
TESCH, PA .
ACTA PHYSIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 140 (01) :31-39
[5]  
DECARLO M, 1992, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V6, P309
[6]  
ENGSTROM LM, 1989, UNPUB IDROTTSVANOR F
[7]  
FERGUSON AB, 1962, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V44, P177
[8]  
Fry A.C., 1991, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, V5, P174, DOI DOI 10.1519/1533-4287(1991)005
[9]  
GOOCH JL, 1993, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V74, P438
[10]  
GREENBERGER H, 1995, J ORTHOP SPORT PHYS, V5, P202