Role of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers:: A prospective phase II study

被引:19
作者
Bollet, Marc A.
Thibault, Fabienne
Bouillon, Kim
Meunier, Martine
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte
Savignoni, Alexia
Dieras, Veronique
Nos, Claude
Salmon, Remy
Fourquet, Alain
机构
[1] Inst Curie, Dept Radiat Oncol, F-75005 Paris, France
[2] Inst Curie, Dept Radiol, F-75005 Paris, France
[3] Inst Curie, Dept Biostat, F-75005 Paris, France
[4] Inst Curie, Dept Pathol, F-75005 Paris, France
[5] Inst Curie, Dept Med Oncol, F-75005 Paris, France
[6] Inst Curie, Dept Surg, F-75005 Paris, France
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2007年 / 69卷 / 01期
关键词
breast cancer; Preoperative; concurrent radiochemotherapy; magnetic resonance imaging;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.02.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the accuracy of clinical examination and of three imaging modalities (ultrasound [US] scan mammography, and magnetic resonance Imaging [MRI]) to assess the tumor response of breast cancer to a preoperative regimen of concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers, using pathologic data as the reference. Methods and Materials: Sixty women were accrued. Treatment consisted of 4 cycles of (5-fluorouracil-vinorel-bine) chemotherapy with, starting with the second cycle of chemotherapy, locoregional radiotherapy to the breast and the internal mammary and supraclavicular and infraclavicular lymph nodes. Breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection were subsequently performed. Breast imaging assessments were performed both before chemotherapy and preoperatively. Results: The correlation coefficients between tumor dimension at imaging and pathology were statistically significant for US scan (r = 0.4; p = 0.006) and MRI (r = 0.4; p = 0.004) but not for clinical examination (r = 0.2. p = 0.16) or mammography (r = -0.15; p = 0.31). Furthermore, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MRI was 0.81, compared with 0.67 for US scan. At the optimal threshold score, MRI performed with 81% sensitivity and 75% specificity. Conclusion: Compared with clinical examination, US scan, or mammography, MRI substantially improved the prediction of pathologic tumor response to preoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy for large breast cancers. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V365, P1687, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   Pathological response to preoperative concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for breast cancer:: Results of a phase II study [J].
Bollet, Marc A. ;
Sigal-Zafrani, Brigitte ;
Gambotti, Laetitia ;
Extra, Jean-Marc ;
Meunier, Martine ;
Nos, Claude ;
Dendale, Remi ;
Campana, Francois ;
Kirova, Youlia M. ;
Dieras, Veronique ;
Fourquet, Alain .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 42 (14) :2286-2295
[4]   Short and long-term effects on survival in breast cancer patients treated by primary chemotherapy:: an updated analysis of a randomized trial [J].
Broët, P ;
Scholl, SM ;
de la Rochefordière, A ;
Fourquet, A ;
Moreau, T ;
De Rycke, Y ;
Asselain, B ;
Pouillart, P .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1999, 58 (02) :151-156
[5]   Good clinical response of breast cancers to neoa uvant chemoendocrine therapy is associated with improved overall survival [J].
Cleator, SJ ;
Makris, A ;
Ashley, SE ;
Lal, R ;
Powles, TJ .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (02) :267-272
[6]   Pre-operative MR-mammography in breast cancer patients [J].
Conrad, C ;
Corfitsen, MT ;
Gyldholm, N ;
Christiansen, FL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (02) :142-145
[7]  
Drew PJ, 2001, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V27, P617
[8]   MR quantification of the washout changes in breast tumors under preoperative chemotherapy: Feasibility and preliminary results [J].
El Khoury, C ;
Servois, V ;
Thibault, F ;
Tardivon, A ;
Ollivier, L ;
Meunier, M ;
Allonier, C ;
Neuenschwander, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 184 (05) :1499-1504
[9]   PATHOLOGICAL PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN BREAST-CANCER .1. THE VALUE OF HISTOLOGICAL GRADE IN BREAST-CANCER - EXPERIENCE FROM A LARGE STUDY WITH LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP [J].
ELSTON, CW ;
ELLIS, IO .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1991, 19 (05) :403-410
[10]   Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the management of breast cancer: Evidence for improved preoperative staging [J].
Esserman, L ;
Hylton, N ;
Yassa, L ;
Barclay, J ;
Frankel, S ;
Sickles, E .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (01) :110-119