A randomized investigator-blinded study comparing pimecrolimus cream 1% with tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in the treatment of pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis

被引:91
作者
Kempers, S
Boguniewicz, M
Carter, E
Jarratt, M
Pariser, D
Stewart, D
Stiller, M
Tschen, E
Chon, K
Wisseh, S
Abrams, B
机构
[1] Minnesota Clin Study Ctr, Fridley, MN 55432 USA
[2] Natl Jewish Med & Res Ctr, Dept Pediat, Div Pulm Med, Denver, CO USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Clin Pharmacol Unit, New York, NY 10027 USA
[4] DermRes Inc, Austin, TX USA
[5] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Dermatol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[6] Virginia Clin Res Inc, Clinton Township, MI USA
[7] Midw Cutaneous Res, Albuquerque, NM USA
[8] Acad Dermatol Associates, E Hanover, NJ USA
[9] Novartis Pharmaceut Corp, E Hanover, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jaad.2004.01.051
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate pimecrolimus cream 1% and tacrolimus ointment 0.03% in pediatric patients with moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). Methods: 141 patients (aged 2-17 years) were randomized to treatment with pimecrolimus cream 1% (n = 71) or tacrolimus ointment 0.03% (n = 70) twice daily for 6 weeks. Results: At clay 4, local, application-site reactions were less common and of shorter duration with pimecrolimus than with tacrolimus. Incidence of erythema/irritation was 8% (6/71) with pimecrolimus compared with 19% (13/70) with tacrolimus (P = .039). Fewer patients receiving pimecrolimus (0%, 0/6) experienced erythema/irritation lasting > 30 minutes, compared with those receiving tacrolimus (85%, 11/13; P < .001). Fewer patients reported itching with pimecrolimus (8%; 6/71) than with tacrolimus (20%; 14/70; P = .073). Incidence of warmth, stinging, and burning was similar in both groups; however, reactions lasting > 30 minutes were fewer with pimecrolimus (0%, 0/14) than with tacrolimus (67%, 8/12; P < .001). More patients receiving pimecrolimus rated ease of application as 'excellent' or 'very good', compared with tacrolimus (76% vs 59%, respectively; P < .020). Efficacy was similar in both groups at day 43. Both treatments were generally well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events. Conclusion: Pimecrolimus cream 1% had better formulation attributes and local tolerability than tacrolimus ointment 0.03% while providing similar efficacy and overall safety in pediatric patients with moderate AD.
引用
收藏
页码:515 / 525
页数:11
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Topical immunomodulators for atopic dermatitis [J].
Bernard, LA ;
Eichenfield, LF .
CURRENT OPINION IN PEDIATRICS, 2002, 14 (04) :414-418
[2]   Topical corticosteroid phobia in patients with atopic eczema [J].
Charman, CR ;
Morris, AD ;
Williams, HC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 142 (05) :931-936
[3]  
Fivenson David, 2002, J Manag Care Pharm, V8, P333
[4]  
FROSCH PJ, 1977, J SOC COSMET CHEM, V28, P197
[5]  
GEHAN EA, 1970, CANCER CHEMOTH REP 1, V54, P225
[6]  
LARSEN FS, 1986, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V15, P487
[7]   The prevalence of atopic dermatitis in Oregon schoolchildren [J].
Laughter, D ;
Istvan, JA ;
Tofte, SJ ;
Hanifin, JM .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2000, 43 (04) :649-655
[8]  
Linnet J, 1999, BRIT J DERMATOL, V140, P268
[9]   Pimecrolimus inhibits the elicitation phase but does not suppress the sensitization phase in murine contact hypersensitivity, in contrast to tacrolimus and cyclosporine A [J].
Meingassner, JG ;
Fahrngruber, H ;
Bavandi, A .
JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY, 2003, 121 (01) :77-80
[10]   Efficacy and safety of tacrolimus ointment compared with that of hydrocortisone acetate ointment in children with atopic dermatitis [J].
Reitamo, S ;
Van Leent, EJM ;
Ho, V ;
Harper, J ;
Ruzicka, T ;
Kalimo, K ;
Cambazard, F ;
Rustin, M ;
Taïeb, A ;
Gratton, D ;
Sauder, D ;
Sharpe, G ;
Smith, C ;
Jünger, M ;
de Prost, Y .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2002, 109 (03) :539-546