Modulation of inhibition of return by type and number of dynamic changes of the cue

被引:10
作者
Riggio, L
Scaramuzza, E
Umiltà, C
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Ist Fisiol Umana, I-43100 Parma, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Gen, Padua, Italy
来源
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG | 2000年 / 64卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s004269900017
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
(IOR) is a response delay when the target is preceded by an irrelevant stimulus (cue) at the same location. In a previous study, we investigated the separate and joint effects on IOR of cue onset and offset. IOR was much greater when cue onset was followed by cue offset (on-off cue) than when the cue was a single event (on or off cues). The aim of the present study was to test whether the greater IOR with an on-off cue is due to the presence of two cue events. Three experiments were conducted. In Experiment 1 we replicated, with a different delay between cue onset and offset, the finding that IOR is greater with an on-off cue than with a single cue event. In Experiments 2 and 3, we used cues formed by two events. In Experiment 2, an on-off cue was compared with an off-on cue, whereas in Experiment 3 an on-on cue was compared with an off-off cue. Results showed that the magnitude of IOR did not simply depend on the number of cue events occurring before the target. IOR was greater with two different events than with two identical events and greater when Inhibition of return was preceded by an off-event than an on-event. Therefore, IOR was greatest with an on-off cue, which likely also benefited from a gap effect. Possible mechanisms underlying IOR were discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 65
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Spatially diffuse inhibition affects multiple locations: A reply to Tipper, Weaver, and Watson (1996) [J].
Abrams, RA ;
Pratt, J .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1996, 22 (05) :1294-1298
[2]  
ABRAMS RA, 1994, EXP BRAIN RES, V98, P483
[3]   The gap effect for eye and hand movements [J].
Bekkering, H ;
Pratt, J ;
Abrams, RA .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1996, 58 (04) :628-635
[4]   SPATIAL-DISTRIBUTION OF THE INHIBITORY EFFECT OF PERIPHERAL NON-INFORMATIVE CUES ON SIMPLE REACTION-TIME TO NON-FIXATED VISUAL TARGETS [J].
BERLUCCHI, G ;
TASSINARI, G ;
MARZI, CA ;
DISTEFANO, M .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1989, 27 (02) :201-221
[5]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN DIRECTED VISUAL-ATTENTION AND SACCADIC REACTION-TIMES [J].
BRAUN, D ;
BREITMEYER, BG .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1988, 73 (03) :546-552
[6]  
BREITMEYER BG, 1977, VISION RES, V17, P861, DOI 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90130-4
[7]   Visuomotor priming [J].
Craighero, L ;
Fadiga, L ;
Rizzolatti, G ;
Umilta, C .
VISUAL COGNITION, 1998, 5 (1-2) :109-125
[8]   Inhibition of return to successively stimulated locations in a sequential visual search paradigm [J].
Danziger, S ;
Kingstone, A ;
Snyder, JJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1998, 24 (05) :1467-1475
[9]   EXPRESS SACCADES AND VISUAL-ATTENTION [J].
FISCHER, B ;
WEBER, H .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1993, 16 (03) :553-567
[10]   MECHANISMS OF VISUAL-ATTENTION REVEALED BY SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
FISCHER, B ;
BREITMEYER, B .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1987, 25 (1A) :73-83