Control of hand shaping in response to object shape perturbation

被引:17
作者
Ansuini, Caterina
Santello, Marco
Tubaldi, Federico
Massaccesi, Stefano
Castiello, Umberto
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dipartimento Psicol Gen, I-35131 Padua, Italy
[2] Arizona State Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Tempe, AZ USA
[3] Univ London Royal Holloway & Bedford New Coll, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00221-006-0840-9
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 [神经生物学];
摘要
This study assessed how hand shaping responds to a perturbation of object shape. In blocked trials (80% of total), subjects were instructed to reach, to grasp and lift a concave or a convex object. In perturbed trials (20% of total), a rotating device allowed for the rapid change from the concave to the convex object or vice versa. In this situation subjects grasped the last presented object. Flexion/extension at the metacarpal-phalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints of all digits was measured by resistive sensors embedded in a glove. In the blocked condition we found that most joints of the fingers were modulated by the type of the to-be-grasped object during the reach. When object shape was perturbed, reach duration was longer and angular excursion of all fingers differed with respect to blocked trials. For the 'convex -> concave' perturbation, a greater degree of finger extension was found than during the blocked 'concave' trials. In contrast, for the 'concave -> convex' perturbation, fingers were more flexed than for the blocked 'convex' trials. The thumb reacted to the perturbation showing a similar pattern (i.e., over-flexion with respect to the blocked trials) regardless the 'direction' of the perturbation. The present results suggest that applying an object shape perturbation during a reach-to-grasp action determines a reorganization of all digits. This pattern is suggestive of a control strategy, which assigns to opposing digits different roles.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 96
页数:12
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1985, EXP BRAIN RES
[2]
BINGHAM G, 1986, EXP BRAIN RES SER, V15, P159
[3]
Reprogramming of grip aperture in a double-step virtual grasping paradigm [J].
Bock, O ;
Jüngling, S .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1999, 125 (01) :61-66
[4]
DOES THE TYPE OF PREHENSION INFLUENCE THE KINEMATICS OF REACHING [J].
CASTIELLO, U ;
BENNETT, KMB ;
PAULIGNAN, Y .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1992, 50 (1-2) :7-15
[5]
Reach to grasp: the response to a simultaneous perturbation of object position and size [J].
Castiello, U ;
Bennett, K ;
Chambers, H .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1998, 120 (01) :31-40
[6]
CASTIELLO U, 1993, EXP BRAIN RES, V94, P163
[7]
THE DISTRIBUTION OF MUSCULAR WEAKNESS IN UPPER MOTOR NEURON LESIONS AFFECTING THE ARM [J].
COLEBATCH, JG ;
GANDEVIA, SC .
BRAIN, 1989, 112 :749-763
[8]
Orientation of the opposition axis in mentally simulated grasping [J].
Frak, V ;
Paulignan, Y ;
Jeannerod, M .
EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2001, 136 (01) :120-127
[9]
Thumb invariance during prehension movement: effects of object orientation [J].
Galea, MP ;
Castiello, U ;
Dalwood, N .
NEUROREPORT, 2001, 12 (10) :2185-2187
[10]
MODELS OF TRAJECTORY FORMATION AND TEMPORAL INTERACTION OF REACH AND GRASP [J].
HOFF, B ;
ARBIB, MA .
JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1993, 25 (03) :175-192