An electromyographic comparison of a modified version of the plank with a long lever and posterior tilt versus the traditional plank exercise

被引:38
作者
Schoenfeld, Brad J. [1 ]
Contreras, Bret [2 ]
Tiryaki-Sonmez, Gul [1 ]
Willardson, Jeffrey M. [3 ]
Fontana, Fabio [4 ]
机构
[1] CUNY Herbert H Lehman Coll, Dept Hlth Sci, Bronx, NY 10468 USA
[2] AUT Univ, Sport Performance Res Inst New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Eastern Illinois Univ, Kinesiol & Sports Studies Dept, Charleston, IL 61920 USA
[4] Univ No Iowa, Sch Hlth Phys Educ & Leisure Serv, Cedar Falls, IA 50614 USA
关键词
long-lever posterior-tilt plank; Core stability; abdominal muscles; core performance; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CORE STABILITY EXERCISES; IMPROVE TRUNK STABILITY; MUSCLE ACTIVATION; POSITION; PERFORMANCE; STRENGTH; POSTURE; HIP;
D O I
10.1080/14763141.2014.942355
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学];
摘要
The purpose of the study was to compare core muscle activation of the tradition prone plank with a modified version performed with a long-lever and posterior-tilt using surface electromyography. To further determine if a specific component of this modified plank was more effective than the other in enhancing muscle activity, the plank with a long lever and the plank with a posterior pelvic tilt were studied individually. Nineteen participants performed all four variations of the plank for 30seconds in a randomized order with 5-minute rest between exercise bouts. Compared to the traditional prone plank, the long-lever posterior-tilt plank displayed a significantly increased activation of the upper rectus abdominis (p<0.001), lower abdominal stabilizers (p<0.001), and external oblique (p<0.001). The long-lever plank showed significantly greater activity compared to the traditional plank in the upper rectus abdominis (p=0.015) and lower abdominal stabilizers (p<0.001), while the posterior tilt plank elicited greater activity in the external oblique (p=0.028). In conclusion, the long-lever posterior-tilt plank significantly increases muscle activation compared to the traditional prone plank. The long-lever component tends to contribute more to these differences than the posterior-tilt component.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 306
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Biely S., 2006, Orthopaedic Practice, V18, P11
[2]
Exploring the Deadlift [J].
Bird, Stephen ;
Barrington-Higgs, Benjamin .
STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2010, 32 (02) :46-51
[3]
The Role of Core Training in Athletic Performance, Injury Prevention, and Injury Treatment [J].
Cissik, John M. .
STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING JOURNAL, 2011, 33 (01) :10-15
[4]
D'Amico John, 2007, N Am J Sports Phys Ther, V2, P251
[5]
Faries MD, 2007, STRENGTH COND J, V29, P10
[6]
[7]
Optimizing Performance by Improving Core Stability and Core Strength [J].
Hibbs, Angela E. ;
Thompson, Kevin G. ;
French, Duncan ;
Wrigley, Allan ;
Spears, Iain .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2008, 38 (12) :995-1008
[8]
EFFECTS OF A 7-WEEK OUTDOOR CIRCUIT TRAINING PROGRAM ON SWISS ARMY RECRUITS [J].
Hofstetter, Marie-Claire ;
Maeder, Urs ;
Wyss, Thomas .
JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH, 2012, 26 (12) :3418-3425
[9]
Muscle activation during exercises to improve trunk stability in men with low back pain [J].
Hubley-Kozey, CL ;
Vezina, MJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 83 (08) :1100-1108
[10]
Jull GA., 1987, PHYS THERAPY LOW BAC, P253