Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy

被引:216
作者
Theilmann, RJ
Borders, R
Trouard, TP
Xia, GW
Outwater, E
Ranger-Moore, J
Gillies, RJ
Stopeck, A
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Arizona Canc Ctr, Dept Biochem & Mol Biophys, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Dept Radiol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Dept Biomed Engn, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[4] Dept Hematol Oncol, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
来源
NEOPLASIA | 2004年 / 6卷 / 06期
关键词
MRI; diffusion; chemotherapy; breast cancer; liver metastases;
D O I
10.1593/neo.03343
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
A goal of oncology is the individualization of patient care to optimize therapeutic responses and minimize toxicities. Achieving this will require noninvasive, quantifiable, and early markers of tumor response. Preclinical data from xenografted tumors using a variety of antitumor therapies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-measured mobility of tissue water (apparent diffusion coefficient of water, or ADC(w)) is a biomarker presaging cell death in the tumor. This communication tests the hypothesis that changes in water mobility will quantitatively presage tumor responses in patients with metastatic liver lesions from breast cancer. A total of 13 patients with metastatic breast cancer and 60 measurable liver lesions were monitored by diffusion MRI after initiation of new courses of chemotherapy. MR images were obtained prior to, and at 4, 11, and 39 days following the initiation of therapy for determination of volumes and ADCw values. The data indicate that diffusion MRI can predict response by 4 or 11 days after commencement of therapy, depending on the analytic method. The highest concordance was observed in tumor lesions that were less than 8 cm(3) in volume at presentation. These results suggest that diffusion MRI can be useful to predict the response of liver metastases to effective chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:831 / 837
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Evaluation of lactate as a 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy index for noninvasive prediction and early detection of tumor response to radiation therapy in EMT6 tumors
    Aboagye, EO
    Bhujwalla, ZM
    He, QH
    Glickson, JD
    [J]. RADIATION RESEARCH, 1998, 150 (01) : 38 - 42
  • [2] Apoptotic volume decrease and the incredible shrinking cell
    Bortner, CD
    Cidlowski, JA
    [J]. CELL DEATH AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2002, 9 (12) : 1307 - 1310
  • [3] Chenevert TL, 1997, CLIN CANCER RES, V3, P1457
  • [4] Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging: an early surrogate marker of therapeutic efficacy in brain tumors
    Chenevert, TL
    Stegman, LD
    Taylor, JMG
    Robertson, PL
    Greenberg, HS
    Rehemtulla, A
    Ross, BD
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (24): : 2029 - 2036
  • [5] Diffusion MRI for prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation
    Dzik-Jurasz, A
    Domenig, C
    George, M
    Wolber, J
    Padhani, A
    Brown, G
    Doran, S
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 360 (9329) : 307 - 308
  • [6] Applications of magnetic resonance in model systems: Cancer therapeutics
    Evelhoch, JL
    Gillies, RJ
    Karczmar, GS
    Koutcher, JA
    Maxwell, RJ
    Nalcioglu, O
    Raghunand, N
    Ronen, SM
    Ross, BD
    Swartz, HM
    [J]. NEOPLASIA, 2000, 2 (1-2): : 152 - 165
  • [7] Diffusion-weighted MRI and response to anti-cancer therapies
    Galons, JP
    Morse, DL
    Jennings, DR
    Gillies, RJ
    [J]. ISRAEL JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2003, 43 (1-2) : 91 - 101
  • [8] GALONS JP, 1999, NEOPLASIA, V1, P133
  • [9] Chemoembolization of liver tumor in a rabbit model: Assessment of tumor cell death with diffusion-weighted MR imaging and histologic analysis
    Geschwind, JFH
    Artemov, D
    Abraham, S
    Omdal, D
    Huncharek, MS
    McGee, C
    Arepally, A
    Lambert, D
    Venbrux, AC
    Lund, GB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2000, 11 (10) : 1245 - 1255
  • [10] Hakumäki JM, 1998, CANCER RES, V58, P3791