Comparison of methods of interpretation of checkerboard synergy testing

被引:144
作者
Bonapace, CR [1 ]
Bosso, JA [1 ]
Friedrich, LV [1 ]
White, RL [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Coll Pharm, Antiinfect Res Lab, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0732-8893(02)00473-X
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Four different methods for interpreting the results of checkerboard synergy testing were compared by applying each to a set of synergy study data. Statistically significant differences in synergy were detected among methods (% synergy ranged from 10 to 83%). As interpretations were found to vary widely based upon method, one should be aware of this in interpreting the relevant literature. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 366
页数:4
相关论文
共 21 条