Neuropsychologists' abilities to determine the predictive value of diagnostic tests

被引:32
作者
Labarge, AS
McCaffrey, RJ
Brown, TA
机构
[1] SUNY Albany, Dept Psychol, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[2] Boston Univ, Ctr Anxiety & Related Disorders, Boston, MA 02215 USA
关键词
neuropsychological assessment; diagnosis; predictive value; JUDGMENT; PROBABILITY; INFORMATION; PSYCHOLOGY; PHYSICIANS; UTILITIES; ACCURACY; RULES;
D O I
10.1016/S0887-6177(01)00193-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The diagnostic utility of a test is relative to the base rate of the diagnosis in the population of interest. The extensive use of tests in neuropsychological assessment makes knowledge of the relevance of base rates in this context an important issue. Professional and associate members of the National Academy of Neuropsychology (NAN; n = 279) answered questions involving (1) a simple use of base rates in the absence of additional diagnostic information, (2) sensitivity and specificity, and (3) positive predictive value (PPV) presented in either a probability or frequency format. Although the majority of participants answered correctly the simple base rate, sensitivity, and specificity questions, only 8.6% answered correctly the PPV question presented in a probability format versus 63.0% correct using a frequency format. These results are discussed in terms of education about the importance and application of base rate information and difficulties applying base rate information in practice. (C) 2001 National Academy of Neuropsychology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 175
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
BALLA JI, 1980, METHOD INFORM MED, V19, P88
[2]  
BALLA JI, 1983, METHOD INFORM MED, V22, P25
[3]  
Bayes T, 1763, Philos Trans R Soc Lond, V53, P370, DOI DOI 10.1098/RSTL.1763.0053
[4]   Use of the odds ratio to translate neuropsychological test scores into real-world outcomes: From statistical significance to clinical significance [J].
Bieliauskas, LA ;
Fastenau, PS ;
Lacy, MA ;
Roper, BL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 1997, 19 (06) :889-896
[5]   INTERPRETATION BY PHYSICIANS OF CLINICAL LABORATORY RESULTS [J].
CASSCELLS, W ;
SCHOENBERGER, A ;
GRABOYS, TB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1978, 299 (18) :999-1001
[6]   PHYSICIANS USE OF PROBABILISTIC INFORMATION IN A REAL CLINICAL SETTING [J].
CHRISTENSENSZALANSKI, JJJ ;
BUSHYHEAD, JB .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1981, 7 (04) :928-935
[7]   Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty [J].
Cosmides, L ;
Tooby, J .
COGNITION, 1996, 58 (01) :1-73
[8]   SEEKING AND APPLYING DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION IN A HEALTH-CARE SETTING [J].
CURLEY, SP ;
YATES, JF ;
YOUNG, MJ .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1990, 73 (03) :211-223
[9]   PSYCHOLOGICAL-TESTS AND CLINICAL DISCRIMINATIONS - BEGINNING TO ADDRESS THE BASE-RATE PROBLEM [J].
ELWOOD, RW .
CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 1993, 13 (05) :409-419
[10]   IMPROVING THE ACCURACY OF CLINICAL JUDGMENT [J].
FAUST, D ;
NURCOMBE, B .
PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1989, 52 (02) :197-208