Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases

被引:142
作者
Aitken, S. J.
Thomas, J. S.
Langdon, S. P.
Harrison, D. J.
Faratian, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh Breakthrough Res Unit, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
breast cancer; ER; HER2; image analysis; molecular phenotype; nodal metastases; PR; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR STATUS; PRIMARY TUMOR; LYMPH-NODES; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; TISSUE MICROARRAYS; PREDICTIVE MARKERS; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; HER-2/NEU; AMPLIFICATION; CARCINOMAS;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdp427
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Assessment of receptors [estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)] is routinely carried out on primary tumour in order to select appropriate adjuvant therapy; the same analysis is not carried out on nodal metastases. Since de novo resistance to therapy is common, we quantified differences in receptor expression between primary and nodal disease in order to assess whether this might contribute to therapeutic resistance. Patients and methods: A total of 385 patients with invasive primary breast carcinomas and paired lymph nodes (n = 211) were assessed for ER, PR and HER2 expression using quantitative immunofluorescence. Cut-points were defined by comparison with tumours scored by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and FISH. Differences in expression for each of the markers and molecular phenotype were analysed. Results: Quantitative receptor expression shows a wide dynamic range compared with IHC. Overall, 46.9% cases had disparate breast/node receptor status of at least one receptor. Many of the differences in expression between primary tumour and node are large magnitude (greater than fivefold) changes. Triple-negative phenotype changes in 23.1% of cases. Conclusions: A significant number of patients show discordant quantitative expression of molecular markers between primary and nodal disease. Appropriately measured, lymph node receptor status could be a more accurate measurement for guiding adjuvant therapy, which requires testing in a clinical trial.
引用
收藏
页码:1254 / 1261
页数:8
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Abe O, 2005, LANCET, V366, P2087, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)66544-0
[2]   Comparison of different scoring systems for immunohistochemical staining [J].
Adams, EJ ;
Green, JA ;
Clark, AH ;
Youngson, JH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (01) :75-77
[3]   Automated subcellular localization and quantification of protein expression in tissue microarrays [J].
Camp, RL ;
Chung, GG ;
Rimm, DL .
NATURE MEDICINE, 2002, 8 (11) :1323-1327
[4]  
Carlson Robert W, 2006, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V4, P971
[5]   HER2 expression in breast cancer primary tumours and corresponding metastases.: Original data and literature review [J].
Carlsson, J ;
Nordgren, H ;
Sjöström, J ;
Wester, K ;
Villman, K ;
Bengtsson, NO ;
Ostenstad, B ;
Lundqvist, H ;
Blomqvist, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (12) :2344-2348
[6]   Molecular biology of breast cancer metastasis - Clinical implications of experimental studies on metastatic inefficiency [J].
Chambers, AF ;
Naumov, GN ;
Vantyghem, SA ;
Tuck, AB .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2000, 2 (06) :400-407
[7]   DISTRIBUTION OF ESTROGEN AND PROGESTERONE RECEPTORS IN PRIMARY TUMOR AND LYMPH-NODES IN INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS WITH BREAST-CANCER [J].
CORADINI, D ;
CAPPELLETTI, V ;
MIODINI, P ;
RONCHI, E ;
SCAVONE, G ;
DIFRONZO, G .
TUMORI JOURNAL, 1984, 70 (02) :165-168
[8]   Correlation between genetic and biological aspects in primary non-metastatic breast cancers and corresponding synchronous axillary lymph node metastasis [J].
D'Andrea, Mario R. ;
Limiti, Maria R. ;
Bari, Mario ;
Zambenedetti, Pamela ;
Montagutti, Adriana ;
Ricci, Francesca ;
Pappagallo, Giovanni L. ;
Sartori, Donata ;
Vinante, Orazio ;
Mingazzini, Pietro L. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 101 (03) :279-284
[9]   Biological characteristics of breast cancer at the primary tumour and the involved lymph nodes [J].
Dikicioglu, E ;
Barutca, S ;
Meydan, N ;
Meteoglu, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (09) :1039-1044
[10]   Predictive markers in breast cancer - the future [J].
Faratian, D. ;
Bartlett, J. .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 52 (01) :91-98