Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution

被引:1022
作者
Butler, MA [1 ]
King, AA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Ornstein-Uhlenbeck; Brownian motion; selective regime; adaptation; evolutionary model; Anolis lizards;
D O I
10.1086/426002
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Biologists employ phylogenetic comparative methods to study adaptive evolution. However, none of the popular methods model selection directly. We explain and develop a method based on the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process, first proposed by Hansen. Ornstein-Uhlenbeck models incorporate both selection and drift and are thus qualitatively different from, and more general than, pure drift models based on Brownian motion. Most importantly, OU models possess selective optima that formalize the notion of adaptive zone. In this article, we develop the method for one quantitative character, discuss interpretations of its parameters, and provide code implementing the method. Our approach allows us to translate hypotheses regarding adaptation in different selective regimes into explicit models, to test the models against data using maximum-likelihood-based model selection techniques, and to infer details of the evolutionary process. We illustrate the method using two worked examples. Relative to existing approaches, the direct modeling approach we demonstrate allows one to explore more detailed hypotheses and to utilize more of the information content of comparative data sets than existing methods. Moreover, the use of a model selection framework to simultaneously compare a variety of hypotheses advances our ability to assess alternative evolutionary explanations.
引用
收藏
页码:683 / 695
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Baum David A., 2001, P24, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511609084.002
[2]   Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile [J].
Blomberg, SP ;
Garland, T ;
Ives, AR .
EVOLUTION, 2003, 57 (04) :717-745
[3]  
Burnham K. P., 2002, MODEL SELECTION INFE
[4]   The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis Lizards [J].
Butler, MA ;
Schoener, TW ;
Losos, JB .
EVOLUTION, 2000, 54 (01) :259-272
[5]  
Butler MA, 1997, EVOLUTION, V51, P1623, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01485.x
[6]  
CHEVERUD JM, 1985, EVOLUTION, V39, P1335, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb05699.x
[7]   PHYLOGENIES AND QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS [J].
FELSENSTEIN, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS, 1988, 19 :445-471
[8]  
FELSENSTEIN J, 1985, AM NAT, V125, P1, DOI 10.1086/284325
[9]   Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence [J].
Freckleton, RP ;
Harvey, PH ;
Pagel, M .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2002, 160 (06) :712-726
[10]   USING PHYLOGENIES TO TEST HYPOTHESES OF ADAPTATION - A CRITIQUE OF SOME CURRENT PROPOSALS [J].
FRUMHOFF, PC ;
REEVE, HK .
EVOLUTION, 1994, 48 (01) :172-180