Lumpy Capacity Investment and Disinvestment Dynamics

被引:37
作者
Besanko, David [1 ]
Doraszelski, Ulrich [2 ]
Lu, Lauren Xiaoyuan [3 ]
Satterthwaite, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwestern Univ, JL Kellogg Grad Sch Management, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Dept Econ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Kenan Flagler Business Sch, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
PERFECT INDUSTRY DYNAMICS; TITANIUM-DIOXIDE INDUSTRY; CONSTRAINTS; EXPANSION; PRECOMMITMENT; COORDINATION; COMPETITION; MODEL; PULP;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1100.0823
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Capacity addition and withdrawal decisions are among the most important strategic decisions made by firms in oligopolistic industries. In this paper, we develop and analyze a fully dynamic model of an oligopolistic industry with lumpy capacity and lumpy investment/disinvestment. We use our model to suggest answers to two questions: First, what economic factors facilitate preemption races? Second, what economic factors facilitate capacity coordination? With a series of examples we show that low product differentiation, low investment sunkness, and high depreciation tend to promote preemption races. The same examples also show that low product differentiation and low investment sunkness tend to promote capacity coordination. Although depreciation removes capacity, it might impede capacity coordination. Finally, our examples show that multiple equilibria arise over at least some range of parameter values. The distinct structures of these equilibria suggest that firms' expectations play a key role in determining whether or not industry dynamics are characterized by preemption races and capacity coordination. Taken together, our results suggest that preemption races and excess capacity in the short run often go hand-in-hand with capacity coordination in the long run.
引用
收藏
页码:1178 / 1193
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Capacity precommitment as a barrier to entry: A Bertrand-Edgeworth approach [J].
Allen, B ;
Deneckere, R ;
Faith, T ;
Kovenock, D .
ECONOMIC THEORY, 2000, 15 (03) :501-530
[2]   PRICE MARGINS AND CAPITAL ADJUSTMENT - CANADIAN MILL PRODUCTS AND PULP AND PAPER INDUSTRIES [J].
BERNSTEIN, JI .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 1992, 10 (03) :491-510
[3]   Capacity dynamics and endogenous asymmetries in firm size [J].
Besanko, D ;
Doraszelski, U .
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2004, 35 (01) :23-49
[4]   Learning-by-Doing, Organizational Forgetting, and Industry Dynamics [J].
Besanko, David ;
Doraszelski, Ulrich ;
Kryukov, Yaroslav ;
Satterthwaite, Mark .
ECONOMETRICA, 2010, 78 (02) :453-508
[5]   AN EMPIRICAL-MODEL OF CAPACITY EXPANSION AND PRICING IN AN OLIGOPOLY WITH BAROMETRIC PRICE LEADERSHIP - A CASE-STUDY OF THE NEWSPRINT INDUSTRY IN NORTH-AMERICA [J].
BOOTH, DL ;
KANETKAR, V ;
VERTINSKY, I ;
WHISTLER, D .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1991, 39 (03) :255-276
[6]   A User's Guide to Solving Dynamic Stochastic Games Using the Homotopy Method [J].
Borkovsky, Ron N. ;
Doraszelski, Ulrich ;
Kryukov, Yaroslav .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2010, 58 (04) :1116-1132
[7]   PRICE SETTING SUPERGAMES WITH CAPACITY CONSTRAINTS [J].
BROCK, WA ;
SCHEINKMAN, JA .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1985, 52 (03) :371-382
[8]   Explaining investment dynamics in US manufacturing:: A generalized (S,s) approach [J].
Caballero, RJ ;
Engel, EMRA .
ECONOMETRICA, 1999, 67 (04) :783-826
[9]  
Christensen LR, 1997, J IND ECON, V45, P47
[10]   Capacity constraints, mergers and collusion [J].
Compte, O ;
Jenny, F ;
Rey, P .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2002, 46 (01) :1-29