Laparoscopy in the management of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver

被引:14
作者
Koea, J
Rodgers, M
Thompson, P
Woodfield, J
Holden, A
McCall, J
机构
[1] Auckland Hosp, Dept Surg, Hepatobiliary & Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Auckland Hosp, Dept Oncol, Hepatobiliary & Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Auckland Hosp, Dept Radiol, Hepatobiliary & Upper Gastrointestinal Unit, Auckland, New Zealand
关键词
clinical staging; colorectal cancer; laparoscopy; liver resection;
D O I
10.1111/j.1445-1433.2004.03267.x
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This investigation was undertaken to define the value of laparoscopy in the staging of patients with colorectal carcinoma metastatic to the liver. Methods: The clinical details of 59 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing laparoscopy prior to planned hepatectomy were entered prospectively on a computerized database. All patients were staged preoperatively with thin slice (5-7 mm) helical computed tomography chest, abdomen and pelvis. Synchronous metastases were defined as those found during, or on imaging carried out within I month of, colorectal resection. Criteria for laparoscopic unresectability were: (i) histologically proven extrahepatic disease; (ii) bilateral inflow or outflow involvement; (iii) the presence of cirrhosis in patients requiring an extended resection (lobectomy or greater); or (iv) hepatic metastases involving more than six hepatic segments. Results: In 24 patients with synchronous metastases (median age 65 years, range 32-81 years) all were resectable on laparoscopic criteria, of whom 21 were resected. Extrahepatic disease was found at laparotomy in three patients. In 35 patients with metachronous metastases (median age 64 years, range 32-81 years) laparoscopy could not be performed in five patients because of adhesions, and three patients were deemed unresectable on laparoscopic criteria. Of the remaining 27 patients, 25 underwent resection while two proved unresectable. Overall eight of 54 evaluable patients had unresectable disease and laparoscopy correctly identified three patients. Conclusions: Following computed tomography scan, 15% of patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma will be found to have unresectable disease. Laparoscopy will identify approximately half. Laparoscopy is of no greater value in staging synchronous versus metachronous metastases.
引用
收藏
页码:1056 / 1059
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Akhurst Timothy, 2002, Adv Surg, V36, P309
[2]   ROLE OF STAGING LAPAROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATIC MALIGNANCY [J].
BABINEAU, TJ ;
LEWIS, WD ;
JENKINS, RL ;
BLEDAY, R ;
STEELE, GD ;
FORSE, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 167 (01) :151-155
[3]  
Bartlett AS, 2003, ANZ J SURG, V73, pA61
[4]  
CHOY G, 2002, NZ MED J, V115, P1
[5]   The value of minimal access surgery in the staging of patients with potentially resectable peripancreatic malignancy [J].
Conlon, KC ;
Dougherty, E ;
Klimstra, DS ;
Coit, DG ;
Turnbull, ADM ;
Brennan, MF .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 223 (02) :134-140
[6]   LAPAROSCOPY IN ABDOMINAL STAGING OF ESOPHAGEAL-CARCINOMA - REPORT OF 369 CASES [J].
DAGNINI, G ;
CALDIRONI, MW ;
MARIN, G ;
BUZZACCARINI, O ;
TREMOLADA, C ;
RUOL, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1986, 32 (06) :400-402
[7]  
Figueras J, 2000, ANN SURG, V232, P721, DOI 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00019
[8]   Clinical score for predicting recurrence after hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer - Analysis of 1001 consecutive cases [J].
Fong, Y ;
Fortner, J ;
Sun, RL ;
Brennan, MF ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 230 (03) :309-318
[9]   The role of diagnostic laparoscopy in pancreatic and periampullary malignancies [J].
Friess, H ;
Kleeff, J ;
Silva, JC ;
Sadowski, C ;
Baer, HU ;
Büchler, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (06) :675-682
[10]   Liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer: Assessing the risk of occult irresectable disease [J].
Jarnagin, WR ;
Fong, YM ;
Ky, A ;
Schwartz, LH ;
Paty, PB ;
Cohen, AM ;
Blumgart, LH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1999, 188 (01) :33-42