Why have some Indian states done better than others at reducing rural poverty?

被引:103
作者
Datt, G [1 ]
Ravallion, M [1 ]
机构
[1] World Bank, Washington, DC 20433 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-0335.00112
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Rural poverty rankings of Indian states in 1990 were very different from those of 1960. This unevenness in progress allows us to study the causes of poverty in a developing rural economy. We model the evolution of various poverty measures using pooled state-level data for the period 1957-91. Differences in trend rates of poverty reduction are attributed to differing growth rates of farm yield per acre and differing initial conditions; states starting with better infrastructure and human resources saw significantly higher long-term rates of poverty reduction. Deviations from trend are attributed to inflation (which hurt the poor in the short term) and shocks to farm and non-farm output.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 38
页数:22
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Ahluwalia MS., 1985, AGR CHANGE RURAL POV
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, WHY POVERTY PERSISTS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1995, HDB DEV EC VOL 3 PAR, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1573-4471(95)30018-X
[4]  
Barro R., 2003, EC GROWTH
[5]  
Bell C., 1994, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, V56, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1994.mp56002001.x
[6]  
BHATTACHARYA N, 1991, POVERTY INEQUALITY P
[7]  
CHATTERJEE GS, 1974, POVERTY INCOME DISTR
[8]  
CHOUDHURY UDR, 1993, J INDIAN SCH POLITIC, V5, P47
[9]   GROWTH AND REDISTRIBUTION COMPONENTS OF CHANGES IN POVERTY MEASURES - A DECOMPOSITION WITH APPLICATIONS TO BRAZIL AND INDIA IN THE 1980S [J].
DATT, G ;
RAVALLION, M .
JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 1992, 38 (02) :275-295
[10]  
DATT G, 1993, INCLUDING POOR