Source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the urban atmosphere: A comparison of three methods

被引:1120
作者
Larsen, RK [1 ]
Baker, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Chesapeake Biol Lab, Ctr Environm Sci, Solomons, MD 20688 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/es0206184
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous pollutants in urban atmospheres. Several PAHs are known carcinogens or are the precursors to carcinogenic daughter compounds. Understanding the contributions of the various emission sources is critical to appropriately managing PAH levels in the environment. The sources of PAHs to ambient air in Baltimore, MD, were determined by using three source apportionment methods, principal component analysis with multiple linear regression, UNMIX, and positive matrix factorization. Determining the source apportionment through multiple techniques mitigates weaknesses in individual methods and strengthens the overlapping conclusions. Overall source contributions compare well among methods. Vehicles, both diesel and gasoline, contribute on average 16-26%, coal 28-36%, oil 15-23%, and wood/other having the greatest disparity of 23-35% of the total (gas- plus particle-phase) PAHs. Seasonal trends were found for both coal and oil. Coal was the dominate PAH source during the summer while oil dominated during the winter. Positive matrix factorization was the only method to segregate diesel from gasoline sources. These methods indicate the number and relative strength of PAH sources to the ambient urban atmosphere. As with all source apportionment techniques, these methods require the user to objectively interpret the resulting source profiles.
引用
收藏
页码:1873 / 1881
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   SEASONALLY DEPENDENT SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS OF ALIPHATIC AND POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS IN URBAN AEROSOLS FROM DENSELY POPULATED AREAS [J].
ACEVES, M ;
GRIMALT, JO .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1993, 27 (13) :2896-2908
[2]   A REVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC-HYDROCARBONS - SOURCES, FATE AND BEHAVIOR [J].
BAEK, SO ;
FIELD, RA ;
GOLDSTONE, ME ;
KIRK, PW ;
LESTER, JN ;
PERRY, R .
WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 1991, 60 (3-4) :279-300
[3]   Diffusive exchange of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons across the air-water interface of the Patapsco River, an urbanized subestuary of the Chesapeake Bay [J].
Bamford, HA ;
Offenberg, JH ;
Larsen, RK ;
Ko, FC ;
Baker, JE .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1999, 33 (13) :2138-2144
[4]  
BENNER BA, 1995, ENVIRON SCI TECHNOL, V29, P2382, DOI 10.1021/es00009a034
[5]   PROFILES OF ORGANIC PARTICULATE-EMISSIONS FROM AIR-POLLUTION SOURCES - STATUS AND NEEDS FOR RECEPTOR SOURCE APPORTIONMENT MODELING [J].
DAISEY, JM ;
CHENEY, JL ;
LIOY, PJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION, 1986, 36 (01) :17-33
[6]  
Duval M.M., 1981, EPA600281161
[7]   POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON (PAH) EMISSIONS FROM CHARCOAL GRILLING [J].
DYREMARK, A ;
WESTERHOLM, R ;
OVERVIK, E ;
GUSTAVSSON, JA .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1995, 29 (13) :1553-1558
[8]   Kinetics and potential significance of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon desorption from creosote-treated wood [J].
Gevao, B ;
Jones, KC .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) :640-646
[9]   Spatial and temporal variation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Arctic atmosphere [J].
Halsall, CJ ;
Barrie, LA ;
Fellin, P ;
Muir, DCG ;
Billeck, BN ;
Lockhart, L ;
Rovinsky, FY ;
Kononov, EY ;
Pastukhov, B .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (12) :3593-3599
[10]   Source apportionment of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from an urban location in Birmingham, UK [J].
Harrison, RM ;
Smith, DJT ;
Luhana, L .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 30 (03) :825-832