A comparative review of four preference-weighted measures of health-related quality of life

被引:179
作者
Kopec, JA
Willison, KD
机构
[1] Univ British Columbia, Dept Hlth Care & Epidemiol, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
[2] Arthritis Res Ctr Canada, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L7, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
[4] Univ Toronto, Inst Human Dev, Toronto, ON M5T 3J1, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
health status; quality of life; utilities; questionnaires; measurement;
D O I
10.1016/S0895-4356(02)00609-1
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Four generic, preference-weighted, health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires (the Quality of Well-Being, the Health Utilities Index, the EQ-5D, and the SF-6D) are reviewed. Although all of these questionnaires are designed to measure the same concept, each uses a different model of health, a different method of deriving preferences, and a different scoring formula. Head-to-head comparisons of preference-weighted questionnaires are limited. By considering several hypothetical health states, we found that utility scores for equivalent states can vary substantially, depending on the measure used. Clinicians and researchers applying preference-weighted HRQL questionnaires should be aware of such differences and exercise caution when interpreting the results. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 325
页数:9
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   COMPARING THE PERFORMANCE OF HEALTH-STATUS MEASURES FOR HEALTHY OLDER ADMITS [J].
ANDERSEN, EM ;
PATRICK, DL ;
CARTER, WB ;
MALMGREN, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1995, 43 (09) :1030-1034
[2]   Comparison of the quality of well-being scale and the SF-36 results among two samples of ill adults: AIDS and other illnesses [J].
Anderson, JP ;
Kaplan, RM ;
Coons, SJ ;
Schneiderman, LJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (09) :755-762
[3]   INTERDAY RELIABILITY OF FUNCTION ASSESSMENT FOR A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE - THE QUALITY OF WELL-BEING SCALE [J].
ANDERSON, JP ;
KAPLAN, RM ;
BERRY, CC ;
BUSH, JW ;
RUMBAUT, RG .
MEDICAL CARE, 1989, 27 (11) :1076-1084
[4]  
AUSTIN P, 2000, J QUAL LIFE RES, V91, P465
[5]   Evaluating changes in health status: Reliability and responsiveness of five generic health status measures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders [J].
Beaton, DE ;
HoggJohnson, S ;
Bombardier, C .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (01) :79-93
[6]  
BELANGER A, 2000, HEAD TO HEAD COMPARI
[7]   Comparison of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) and the EuroQol EQ-5D in patients treated for intermittent claudication [J].
Bosch, JL ;
Hunink, MGM .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2000, 9 (06) :591-601
[8]   ECONOMIC-EVALUATION OF NEONATAL INTENSIVE-CARE OF VERY-LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS [J].
BOYLE, MH ;
TORRANCE, GW ;
SINCLAIR, JC ;
HORWOOD, SP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 308 (22) :1330-1337
[9]   The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36 [J].
Brazier, J ;
Roberts, J ;
Deverill, M .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2002, 21 (02) :271-292
[10]   Deriving a preference-based single index from the UK SF-36 Health Survey [J].
Brazier, J ;
Usherwood, T ;
Harper, R ;
Thomas, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (11) :1115-1128