The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system

被引:100
作者
Chen, Chao-hsiu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Educ, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
关键词
Evaluation of CAL systems; Improving classroom teaching; Teaching/learning strategies; STUDENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Recently, more and more researchers have been exploring uses of mobile technology that support new instructional strategies. Based on research findings related to peer and self assessment, this study developed a Mobile Assessment Participation System (MAPS) using Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) as the platform In addition. the study proposes an implementation model of the MAPS that should facilitate the effectiveness of self- and peer-assessment in classrooms The researcher argues that teachers and students can benefit from MAPS in various regards including more flexible assessment arrangement, more efficient use of time, and more opportunities for student reflection on learning and assessment. Thirty-seven students taking teacher-education courses with the researcher participated in this study, and these students employed the MAPS to conduct two-round assessment activities that would help these students assess both their own and one another's final projects Both the students' valid responses in a survey herein and scores obtained from the assessment activities confirmed the benefits of the MAPS and its implementation model Yet, the students voiced such concerns as the objectivity of peer-assessment and the difficulty of providing constructive feedback, and the correlation analysis indicated a lack of consistency between teacher-grading and student-grading (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment
    Ashworth, P
    Bannister, P
    Thorne, P
    [J]. STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1997, 22 (02) : 187 - 203
  • [2] Ballantyne R., 2002, Assessment Evaluation in Higher Education, V27, P427, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/0260293022000009302, DOI 10.1080/0260293022000009302]
  • [3] Bloxham S., 2004, ASSESS EVAL HIGH EDU, V29, P721, DOI DOI 10.1080/0260293042000227254
  • [4] Bransford J. D., 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School
  • [5] Computerized peer assessment
    Davies, P
    [J]. INNOVATIONS IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 37 (04): : 346 - 355
  • [6] Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices
    Davis, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2003, 19 (03) : 298 - 307
  • [7] Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system
    Draper, SW
    Brown, MI
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2004, 20 (02) : 81 - 94
  • [8] Falchikov N, 2000, REV EDUC RES, V70, P287, DOI 10.2307/1170785
  • [9] Gibbs G., 2006, Innovative Assessment in higher education, P23, DOI https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203969670
  • [10] Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles
    Lin, SSJ
    Liu, EZF
    Yuan, SM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 2001, 17 (04) : 420 - 432