Symbiotic efficiency and infectivity of an autochthonous arbuscular mycorrhizal Glomus sp from saline soils and Glomus deserticola under salinity

被引:162
作者
Ruiz-Lozano, JM [1 ]
Azcón, R [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIC, Dept Microbiol Suelo & Sistemas Simbiot, Estac Expt Zaidin, E-18080 Granada, Spain
关键词
arbuscular-mycorrhiza; infectivity; fungal isolate; salt stress; symbiotic efficiency;
D O I
10.1007/s005720000075
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of salinity on the symbiotic efficiencies and mycelial infectivity of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), one isolated from saline soils (Glomus sp.) and the other (Glomus deserticola) from nonsaline soils (belonging to the Estacion Experimental del Zaidin collection). Lettuce plants inoculated with either of these two fungi or maintained as uninoculated controls were grown in soil with three salt concentrations (0.25, 0.50 or 0.75 g NaCl kg(-1) dry soil). Both AMF protected host plants against salinity. However, when the results of shoot dry weight and nutrient contents were expressed relative to the total length of mycorrhiza formed, it was found that both AMF differed in their symbiotic efficiencies. These differences were more evident at the two highest salt levels. Glomus sp.-colonized plants grew less and accumulated less N and P, whereas they formed a higher amount of mycorrhiza. The mechanism by which Glomus sp. protected plants from the detrimental effects of salt was based on the stimulation of root development, while the effects of G. deserticola were based on improved plant nutrition. The increase in salinity of soil decreased the hyphal growth and/or viability of Glomus sp. to a higher extent than those of G. deserticola since the mycelial network generated by G. deserticola was more infective than that of Glomus sp.
引用
收藏
页码:137 / 143
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
ALLEN EB, 1983, NEW PHYTOL, V93, P227, DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1983.tb03427.x
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1965, METHODS SOIL CHEM 2
[3]   ROSE LEAF ELASTICITY CHANGES IN RESPONSE TO MYCORRHIZAL COLONIZATION AND DROUGHT ACCLIMATION [J].
AUGE, RM ;
SCHEKEL, KA ;
WAMPLE, RL .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 1987, 70 (02) :175-182
[4]   MYCORRHIZAS IN NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BRUNDRETT, M .
ADVANCES IN ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1991, 21 :171-313
[5]   EFFECTS OF AMMONIUM AND NITRATE IONS ON MYCORRHIZAL INFECTION, NODULATION AND GROWTH OF TRIFOLIUM-SUBTERRANEUM [J].
CHAMBERS, CA ;
SMITH, SE ;
SMITH, FA .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1980, 85 (01) :47-62
[6]   Tomato growth in response to salinity and mycorrhizal fungi from saline or nonsaline soils [J].
Copeman, RH ;
Martin, CA ;
Stutz, JC .
HORTSCIENCE, 1996, 31 (03) :341-344
[7]   INFECTIVITY OF VESICULAR ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL INOCULA AFTER STORAGE UNDER VARIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL-CONDITIONS [J].
DAFT, MJ ;
SPENCER, D ;
THOMAS, GE .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE BRITISH MYCOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1987, 88 :21-27
[8]  
DIAZ G, 1994, ARID SOIL RES REHAB, V8, P59
[9]  
DIAZ G, 1992, THESIS U MURCIA SPAI
[10]   SALT STRESS AFFECTS IN-VITRO GROWTH AND IN-SITU SYMBIOSES OF ECTOMYCORRHIZAL FUNGI [J].
DIXON, RK ;
RAO, MV ;
GARG, VK .
MYCORRHIZA, 1993, 3 (02) :63-68