Apolipoprotein E genotypes and response of plasma lipids and progression-regression of coronary atherosclerosis to lipid-lowering drug therapy

被引:71
作者
Ballantyne, CM
Herd, JA
Stein, EA
Ferlic, LL
Dunn, JK
Gotto, AM
Marian, AJ
机构
[1] Baylor Coll Med, Dept Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Med Res Labs, Highland Heights, KY USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Med, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00918-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES We sought to examine the association of apolipoprotein (apo) E genotypes with baseline plasma lipid levels and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD), as well as the response to treatment with fluvastatin in the Lipoprotein and Coronary Atherosclerosis Study (LCAS). BACKGROUND Apo E genotypes have been associated with plasma lipid levels and CAD. However, the influence of apo E genotypes on the response of plasma lipids and CAD progression or regression to statin treatment in patients with mildly to moderately elevated cholesterol remains unknown. METHODS Apo E genotypes were determined by polymerase chain reaction and restriction mapping. Plasma lipids were measured at baseline and 12 weeks after therapy with fluvastatin or placebo in 320 subjects. In 287 subjects, quantitative coronary angiography was performed at baseline and after 2.5 years of treatment. RESULTS Subjects with the 3/3 genotype had greater reductions in total cholesterol (20.4% vs. 15.4%, p = 0.01) and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (28.8% vs. 22.7%, p = 0.03) than did the subjects with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype. In contrast, subjects with the 2/3 genotype (n = 10) had a greater increase in high density lipoprotein cholesterol (19.1%) than did the subjects with the 3/3 genotype (4.3%, p = 0.002) and those with the 3/4 or 4/4 genotype (7.0%, p = 0.02). Subjects with the. 3/4 or 4/4 genotype had an increased frequency of previous angioplasty, but other measures of baseline CAD severity and baseline lipids did not differ significantly among the genotypes, nor did CAD progression or clinical events. CONCLUSIONS Although subjects with the epsilon4 allele had less reduction in LDL cholesterol with fluvastatin, they had similar benefit in terms of CAD progression. (C) 2000 by the American College of Cardiology.
引用
收藏
页码:1572 / 1578
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Influence of low HDL on progression of coronary artery disease and response to fluvastatin therapy
    Ballantyne, CM
    Herd, JA
    Ferlic, LL
    Dunn, JK
    Farmer, JA
    Jones, PH
    Schein, JR
    Gotto, AM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 1999, 99 (06) : 736 - 743
  • [2] BALLANTYNE CM, 1999, J AM COLL CARD SA272, V33
  • [3] APOLIPOPROTEIN-E PHENOTYPES IN FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA - IMPORTANCE FOR EXPRESSION OF DISEASE AND RESPONSE TO THERAPY
    BERGLUND, L
    WIKLUND, O
    EGGERTSEN, G
    OLOFSSON, SO
    ERIKSSON, M
    LINDEN, T
    BONDJERS, G
    ANGELIN, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 233 (02) : 173 - 178
  • [4] BOERWINKLE E, 1991, AM J HUM GENET, V49, P1145
  • [5] Bohnet K, 1996, J LIPID RES, V37, P1316
  • [6] THE RESPONSE TO LOVASTATIN TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH HETEROZYGOUS FAMILIAL HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA IS MODULATED BY APOLIPOPROTEIN-E POLYMORPHISM
    CARMENA, R
    ROEDERER, G
    MAILLOUX, H
    LUSSIERCACAN, S
    DAVIGNON, J
    [J]. METABOLISM-CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL, 1993, 42 (07): : 895 - 901
  • [7] APOLIPOPROTEIN-E POLYMORPHISM AND ATHEROSCLEROSIS
    DAVIGNON, J
    GREGG, RE
    SING, CF
    [J]. ARTERIOSCLEROSIS, 1988, 8 (01): : 1 - 21
  • [8] DEKNIJFF P, 1990, ATHEROSCLEROSIS, V83, P89
  • [9] Human apolipoprotein E4 domain interaction - Arginine 61 and glutamic acid 255 interact to direct the preference for very low density lipoproteins
    Dong, LM
    Weisgraber, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 1996, 271 (32) : 19053 - 19057
  • [10] RELATION OF APOLIPOPROTEIN E PHENOTYPE TO MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION AND MORTALITY FROM CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE
    EICHNER, JE
    KULLER, LH
    ORCHARD, TJ
    GRANDITS, GA
    MCCALLUM, LM
    FERRELL, RE
    NEATON, JD
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1993, 71 (02) : 160 - 165