Poverty alleviation and the eviction of the poorest: Towards urban land reform in the Philippines

被引:32
作者
Berner, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Social Studies, NL-2502 LT The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2427.00265
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Conventional policies of urban poverty alleviation have proven to be largely ineffective. They have, in particular, failed to defuse the worsening housing crisis in the large cities of the developing world. Shortcomings in funding and implementation notwithstanding, the Philippine 'Community Mortgage Program' (CMP) represents a promising paradigm shift. It allows squatter associations to acquire land by means of state-guaranteed credit which is to be repaid over a period of 25 years. The resulting instalments are well below the rent for a single room in the same area and are consequently acceptable to most residents. The CMP is thus effectively addressing one of the crucial problems of squatters, namely, precarious access to urban land and insecurity of tenure. The results of our studies in Manila and Cebu City, however, indicate that the programme always excludes a substantial part of the community members, among them the dire poor. The unintended consequence is a division of communities which often turns into violent conflict.
引用
收藏
页码:554 / 566
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
ALDRICH BC, 1995, HOUSING URBAN POOR P
[2]   MAKING SENSE OF URBAN POVERTY [J].
AMIS, P .
ENVIRONMENT AND URBANIZATION, 1995, 7 (01) :145-157
[3]  
[Anonymous], NEW SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
[4]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J DEV RES, DOI DOI 10.1080/09578819708426682
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB DEV EC B
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS U KENTUCKY LE
[7]  
Baross P., 1990, TRANSFORMATION LAND
[8]   The new poverty agency: A disputed consensus [J].
Baulch, B .
IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 1996, 27 (01) :1-10
[9]  
Bello Walden, 1982, DEV DEBACLE WORLD BA
[10]   GLOBALIZATION AND LOCAL RESISTANCE - THE CREATION OF LOCALITIES IN MANILA AND BANGKOK [J].
BERNER, E ;
KORFF, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF URBAN AND REGIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 19 (02) :208-222