Cognitive performance, mood and experimental pain before and during morphine-induced analgesia in patients with chronic non-malignant pain

被引:125
作者
Lorenz, J
Beck, H
Bromm, B
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Inst Physiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Anaesthesiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
chronic non-malignant pain; morphine; laser evoked potentials; pain measurement; P300; cognitive function;
D O I
10.1016/S0304-3959(97)00123-1
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
This paper investigates subjective, behavioral and neurophysiological changes due to treatment with oral sustained-release morphine in six patients with severe non-malignant pain. Patients rated their mood and clinical pain on visual analog scales (VAS). Experimental pain reactions were quantified by ratings on categorial scales and evoked cerebral potentials (LEP) in response to standardized laser stimuli. A standard auditory oddball task provided reaction time (RT), errors, N1 and P2 of late auditory evoked potentials (AEP), and a P300 component. It was used to measure vigilance and cognitive performance. In parallel with clinical pain reduction, laser pain ratings and LEP amplitudes were significantly reduced. In contrast, auditory P2 and P300 amplitude were found to be even enlarged under morphine. RT and mood also failed to indicate any sedation. It is concluded that LEP indicated the analgesic morphine effects whereas late potentials and P300 from auditory stimuli reflected the perceptual-cognitive status which, instead of being deteriorated by morphine-induced sedation, improved probably due to the removal of pain as a mental stressor. (C) 1997 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 375
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   SEGMENTAL INHIBITION OF LASER-EVOKED BRAIN POTENTIALS BY IPSILATERALLY AND CONTRALATERALLY APPLIED COLD PRESSOR PAIN [J].
ARENDTNIELSEN, L ;
GOTLIEBSEN, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 64 (01) :56-61
[2]  
BIRBAUMER N, 1995, ADV PAIN RES THER, V22, P331
[3]  
BROMM B, 1991, REV NEUROL-FRANCE, V147, P625
[4]   THE COGNITIVE EFFECTS OF THE ADMINISTRATION OF NARCOTIC ANALGESICS IN PATIENTS WITH CANCER PAIN [J].
BRUERA, E ;
MACMILLAN, K ;
HANSON, J ;
MACDONALD, RN .
PAIN, 1989, 39 (01) :13-16
[5]   THE MCGILL PAIN QUESTIONNAIRE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PHASIC AND TONIC EXPERIMENTAL PAIN - BEHAVIORAL-EVALUATION OF THE PAIN INHIBITING PAIN EFFECT [J].
CHEN, ACN ;
TREEDE, RD .
PAIN, 1985, 22 (01) :67-79
[6]  
CHEN ACN, 1984, PAIN MEASUREMENT MAN, P301
[7]   ACTIVITY-DEPENDENT NEURONAL PLASTICITY FOLLOWING TISSUE-INJURY AND INFLAMMATION [J].
DUBNER, R ;
RUDA, MA .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1992, 15 (03) :96-103
[8]   THE EFFECT OF EMOTION ON CUE UTILIZATION AND THE ORGANIZATION OF BEHAVIOR [J].
EASTERBROOK, JA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1959, 66 (03) :183-201
[9]   THE ATTENTIONAL CONTROL OF PAIN - METHODOLOGICAL AND THEORETICAL CONCERNS [J].
ECCLESTON, C .
PAIN, 1995, 63 (01) :3-10
[10]   EEG AND AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIAL P300 COMPARED WITH PSYCHOMETRIC TESTS IN ASSESSING VIGILANCE AFTER BENZODIAZEPINE SEDATION AND ANTAGONISM [J].
ENGELHARDT, W ;
FRIESS, K ;
HARTUNG, E ;
SOLD, M ;
DIERKS, T .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1992, 69 (01) :75-80