Wind-firmness in Pinus pinaster Ait. stands in Southwest France:: influence of stand density, fertilisation and breeding in two experimental stands damaged during the 1999 storm

被引:42
作者
Cucchi, V [1 ]
Bert, D [1 ]
机构
[1] INRA Bordeaux, Lab Croissance & Prod, Unite Rech Forestieres Pierroton, F-33612 Cestas, France
关键词
windthrow; silviculture; Pinus pinaster; stability; storm; MARITIME PINE; PICEA-SITCHENSIS; TREE STABILITY; ROOT-ANCHORAGE; SITKA SPRUCE; FOREST; STEM; DYNAMICS; GROWTH; MODELS;
D O I
10.1051/forest:2003013
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Maritime pine (Pinus pinaster) stands in the Aquitaine region are of great economic importance but subject to Atlantic storms. In the Bordeaux region, two experimental sites located near each other, aged 20 and 51 years, made it possible to study the effects of different types of silviculture on wind-firmness during the 1999 storm. Stand density has a major influence on tree growth. When density increases, height increases and circumference decreases appreciably. In the dense stands, windthrown trees were less abundant and there were more leaning pines. With respect to other silvicultural factors in stands planted at typical densities: (i) genetic breeding did not increase damage intensity at the 20-year-old experimental site and phosphorus fertilisation decreased the windthrow at the 51-year-old experimental site; (ii) compared to the undamaged trees, the circumference of windthrown trees was 3.6 cm smaller, the relative crown length was 10% shorter and the stem taper coefficient was higher. This research has shown that wind-firmness is better in stands where the height, circumference and crown length are homogeneous. A more closed canopy seems to improve wind resistance by increasing the damping effect of swaying as a result of the crowns being in contact with each other and provides a more favourable ratio between the aerial parts and the roots.
引用
收藏
页码:209 / 226
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Becquey J., 1987, REV FRAN AISE, V39, P323, DOI [10.4267/2042/25804, DOI 10.4267/2042/25804]
[2]  
BERT D, 1998, INRA RES UNIT TREE P, P7
[3]  
Bouchon J., 1988, DENDROMETRIE
[4]  
BOUCHON T, 1987, REV FORESTIERE FRANC, V39, P301
[5]   Strength properties of wind- and snow-damaged stems of Picea sitchensis and Pinus sylvestris in comparison with undamaged trees [J].
Cameron, AD ;
Dunham, RA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1999, 29 (05) :595-599
[6]  
CARNUS JM, 2002, EUR FOR I P, V45, P81
[7]   Coupling SAR data with forest growth models [J].
Champion, I ;
Dewar, R ;
Loustau, D ;
Bert, D ;
Danjon, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2000, 21 (08) :1763-1766
[8]  
COOPER KR, 1996, LTRA4 NAT RES COUNC
[9]  
COUDURIER T, 1995, C I NATL RECHERCHE A, V74, P305
[10]  
Coutts M.P., 2000, The Supporting Roots of Trees and Woody Plants: Form, Function and Physiology, P3, DOI [10.1007/978-94-017-3469-11, DOI 10.1007/978-94-017-3469-11, 10.1007/978-94-017-3469-1_1]