Effect of Chlorhexidine Whole-Body Bathing on Hospital-Acquired Infections Among Trauma Patients

被引:97
作者
Evans, Heather L. [1 ]
Dellit, Timothy H. [2 ]
Chan, Jeannie [3 ]
Nathens, Avery B. [4 ]
Maier, Ronald V. [1 ]
Cuschieri, Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Allergy & Infect Dis, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Harborview Med Ctr, Dept Pharm, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
RESISTANT STAPHYLOCOCCUS-AUREUS; INTENSIVE-CARE-UNIT; RISK-FACTORS; POVIDONE-IODINE; ACINETOBACTER-BAUMANNII; COLONIZATION PRESSURE; CONTACT ISOLATION; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; ENTEROCOCCUS; ACQUISITION;
D O I
10.1001/archsurg.2010.5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To demonstrate whether daily bathing with cloths impregnated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate will decrease colonization of resistant bacteria and reduce the rates of health care-associated infections in critically injured patients. Design: Retrospective analysis of data collected 6 months before and after institution of a chlorhexidine bathing protocol. Setting: A 12-bed intensive care unit in a level I trauma center. Patients: Two hundred eighty-six severely injured patients underwent daily chlorhexidine bathing during the 6-month intervention; 253 patients were bathed without chlorhexidine prior to the intervention. Interventions: Daily chlorhexidine bathing. Main Outcomes Measures: Rates of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), bloodstream infection, and colonization with resistant organisms (methicillinresistant Staphylococcus aureus [MRSA] or Acinetobacter species). Results: Baseline patient and injury characteristics were similar between cohorts. Patients receiving chlorhexidine bathsweresignificantlylesslikelytoacquireacatheter- related bloodstream infection than comparators (2.1 vs 8.4 infections per 1000 catheter-days, P=.01). The incidence of VAP was not affected by chlorhexidine baths (16.9 vs 21.6 infections per 1000 ventilator-days in those with vs those without chlorhexidine baths, respectively, P=. 30). However, patients who received chlorhexidine baths were less likely to develop MRSA VAP (1.6 vs 5.7 infections per 1000 ventilator-days, P=. 03). The rate of colonization with MRSA (23.3 vs 69.3 per 1000 patient-days, P<.001) and Acinetobacter (1.0 vs 4.6 per 1000 patient-days, P=.36) was significantly lower in the chlorhexidine group than in the comparison group. Conclusions: Daily bathing of trauma patients with cloths impregnated with 2% chlorhexidine gluconate is associated with a decreased rate of colonization by MRSA and Acinetobacter and lower rates of catheter-related bloodstream infection and MRSA VAP.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 246
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[2]   Effectiveness of chlorhexidine bathing to reduce catheter-associated bloodstream infections in medical intensive care unit patients [J].
Bleasdale, Susan C. ;
Trick, William E. ;
Gonzalez, Ines M. ;
Lyles, Rosie D. ;
Hayden, Mary K. ;
Weinstein, Robert A. .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 167 (19) :2073-2079
[3]   The role of "colonization pressure" in the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci - An important infection control variable [J].
Bonten, MJM ;
Slaughter, S ;
Ambergen, AW ;
Hayden, MK ;
van Voorhis, J ;
Nathan, C ;
Weinstein, RA .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 158 (10) :1127-1132
[4]   Impact of 4% chlorhexidine whole-body washing on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii skin colonisation among patients in a medical intensive care unit [J].
Borer, A. ;
Gilad, J. ;
Porat, N. ;
Megrelesvilli, R. ;
Saidel-Odes, L. ;
Peled, N. ;
Eskira, S. ;
Schlaeffer, F. ;
Almog, Y. .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2007, 67 (02) :149-155
[5]   A hospital epidemic of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus:: Risk factors and control [J].
Byers, KE ;
Anglim, AM ;
Anneski, CJ ;
Germanson, TP ;
Gold, HS ;
Durbin, LJ ;
Simonton, BM ;
Farr, BM .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2001, 22 (03) :140-147
[6]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) HHS, 2007, Fed Regist, V72, P47129
[7]   Risk factors for developing clinical infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) amongst hospital patients initially only colonized with MRSA [J].
Coello, R ;
Glynn, JR ;
Gaspar, C ;
Picazo, JJ ;
Fereres, J .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1997, 37 (01) :39-46
[8]   Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nares colonization at hospital admission and its effect on subsequent MRSA infection [J].
Davis, KA ;
Stewart, JJ ;
Crouch, HK ;
Florez, CE ;
Hospenthal, DR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2004, 39 (06) :776-782
[9]   Contact isolation in surgical patients: A barrier to care? [J].
Evans, HL ;
Shaffer, MM ;
Hughes, MG ;
Smith, RL ;
Chong, TW ;
Raymond, DP ;
Pelletier, SJ ;
Pruett, TL ;
Sawyer, RG .
SURGERY, 2003, 134 (02) :180-188
[10]   What to think if the results of the National Institutes of Health randomized trial of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus control measures are negative (and other advice to young epidemiologists):: A review and an au revoir [J].
Farr, Barry M. .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (10) :1096-1106