Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Telephone Counseling Intervention in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers

被引:37
作者
Graves, Kristi D. [1 ,2 ]
Wenzel, Lari [4 ,5 ]
Schwartz, Marc D. [1 ,2 ]
Luta, George [3 ]
Wileyto, Paul [6 ]
Narod, Steven [8 ]
Peshkin, Beth N. [1 ,2 ]
Marcus, Alfred [9 ]
Cella, David [10 ]
Emsbo, Susan Powell [9 ]
Barnes, Denise [9 ]
Halbert, Chanita Hughes [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ, Fisher Ctr Familial Canc Res, Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Dept Oncol, Dept Biostat Bioinformat & Biomath, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[4] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Med, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
[5] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Populat Hlth & Dis Prevent, Irvine, CA USA
[6] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[7] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Ctr Community Based Res & Hlth Dispar, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[8] Womens Coll Hosp, Ctr Res Womens Hlth, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2, Canada
[9] Univ Colorado, Ctr Canc, AMC Canc Res Ctr, Denver, CO 80262 USA
[10] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Dept Med Social Sci, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
OVARIAN-CANCER; HEREDITARY BREAST; DECISION-MAKING; FAMILY-HISTORY; WOMEN; RISK; DISTRESS; IMPACT; PREDICTORS; UNCERTAINTY;
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0548
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Responses following BRCA1/2 genetic testing are relevant for the comprehension of risk status and may play a role in risk management decision making. The objective of this study was to evaluate a psychosocial telephone counseling (PTC) intervention delivered to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers following standard genetic counseling (SGC). We examined the effect of the intervention on distress and the concerns related to genetic testing. Methods: This prospective randomized clinical trial included 90 BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. We measured anxiety, depression, and genetic testing distress outcomes at intervention baseline and 6 and 12 months following disclosure. We evaluated the effects of SGC versus SGC plus PTC on psychological outcomes using intention-to-treat analyses through generalized estimating equations. Results: At 6 months, PTC reduced depressive symptoms (Z = -2.25, P = 0.02) and genetic testing distress (Z = 2.18, P = 0.02) compared with SGC. Furthermore, women in the intervention condition reported less clinically significant anxiety at 6 months (chi(2)(1) = 4.11, P = 0.04) than women who received SGC. We found no differences in outcomes between the intervention groups at the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions: As an adjunct to SGC, PTC delivered following disclosure of positive BRCA1/2 test results seems to offer modest short-term benefits for distress and anxiety. These results build upon a growing literature of psychosocial interventions for BRCA1/2 carriers and, given the potential impact of affect on risk management decision making, suggest that some carriers may derive benefits from adjuncts to traditional genetic counseling. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 19(3); 648-54. (C) 2010 AACR.
引用
收藏
页码:648 / 654
页数:7
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   A brief assessment of concerns associated with genetic testing for cancer: The Multidimensional Impact of Cancer Risk Assessment (MICRA) questionnaire [J].
Cella, D ;
Hughes, C ;
Peterman, A ;
Chang, CH ;
Peshkin, BN ;
Schwartz, MD ;
Wenzel, L ;
Lemke, A ;
Marcus, AC ;
Lerman, C .
HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 21 (06) :564-572
[2]   Satisfaction with genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among African American women [J].
Charles, Sarah ;
Kessler, Lisa ;
Stopfer, Jill E. ;
Domchek, Susan ;
Halbert, Chanita Hughes .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (1-2) :196-204
[3]   Distress and psychiatric morbidity among women from high-risk breast and ovarian cancer families [J].
Coyne, JC ;
Benazon, NR ;
Gaba, CG ;
Calzone, K ;
Weber, BL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 68 (05) :864-874
[4]   Communicating genetic test results to the family: A six-step, skills-building strategy [J].
Daly, MB ;
Barsevick, A ;
Miller, SM ;
Buckman, R ;
Costalas, J ;
Montgomery, S ;
Bingler, R .
FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 24 (03) :13-26
[5]   HOPKINS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST (HSCL) - SELF-REPORT SYMPTOM INVENTORY [J].
DEROGATIS, LR ;
LIPMAN, RS ;
RICKELS, K ;
UHLENHUTH, EH ;
COVI, L .
BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (01) :1-15
[6]  
Donner AK., 2000, DESIGN ANAL CLUSTER
[7]   Anticipated versus actual emotional reactions to disclosure of results of genetic tests for cancer susceptibility:: Findings from p53 and BRCA1 testing programs [J].
Dorval, M ;
Patenaude, AF ;
Schneider, KA ;
Kieffer, SA ;
DiGianni, L ;
Kalkbrenner, KJ ;
Bromberg, JI ;
Basili, LA ;
Calzone, K ;
Stopfer, J ;
Weber, BL ;
Garber, JE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (10) :2135-2142
[8]   EFFECT OF VIOLATION OF NORMALITY ON THE T-TEST OF THE CORRELATION-COEFFICIENT [J].
EDGELL, SE ;
NOON, SM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1984, 95 (03) :576-583
[9]  
Esplen MJ, 2000, PSYCHO-ONCOL, V9, P243
[10]   Predictors and outcomes of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy among breast cancer survivors [J].
Graves, Kristi D. ;
Peshkin, Beth N. ;
Halbert, Chanita H. ;
DeMarco, Tiffani A. ;
Isaacs, Claudine ;
Schwartz, Marc D. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2007, 104 (03) :321-329