Pretreatment attrition in a comparative treatment outcome study on panic disorder

被引:66
作者
Hofmann, SG
Barlow, DH
Papp, LA
Detweiler, MF
Ray, SE
Shear, MK
Woods, SW
Gorman, JM
机构
[1] Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, Hillside Hosp, Phobia Clin, Glen Oaks, NY 11004 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Western Psychiat Inst & Clin, Anxiety Disorders Clin, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Anxiety Disorders Clin, New Haven, CT USA
[4] SUNY Albany, Ctr Stress & Anxiety Disorders, Albany, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1176/ajp.155.1.43
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Objective: Whereas the fact of attrition during the course of treatment is well documented, little is known about the factors that affect sample selection before the beginning of a study ("pretreatment attrition"). The present study reports on the degree and sources of pretreatment attrition at two sites of a multicenter study on panic disorder that compared treatment outcomes for imipramine and cognitive behavior therapy. Method: Data were collected at two clinical research sites, one with a pharmacological treatment orientation (N=420) and one with a psychosocial treatment orientation (N=208). Results: The main source of pretreatment attrition was participant refusal. At both research sites, eligible patients most often refused participation because they were either unwilling to start treatment with imipramine (30.6% and 47.4%, respectively) or discontinue their current medication (22.6% and 35.1%, respectively). Conclusions: Results from comparative treatment outcome studies are limited not only to people who meet the study criteria but also to those who are willing to begin a medication treatment and discontinue their current medication.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 47
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   BEHAVIORAL TREATMENT OF PANIC DISORDER [J].
BARLOW, DH ;
CRASKE, MG ;
CERNY, JA ;
KLOSKO, JS .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1989, 20 (02) :261-282
[2]  
Biglan A, 1991, NIDA Res Monogr, V107, P213
[3]  
DINARDO PA, 1988, ANXIETY DISORDERS IN
[4]  
DINARDO PA, 1994, ANXIETY DISORDERS IN
[5]  
FARMER ME, 1994, INT J METHOD PSYCH, V4, P19
[6]   EVALUATING INTERVENTIONS WITH DIFFERENTIAL ATTRITION - THE IMPORTANCE OF NONRESPONSE MECHANISMS AND USE OF FOLLOW-UP DATA [J].
GRAHAM, JW ;
DONALDSON, SI .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (01) :119-128
[7]  
Green S. M., 1994, J CHILD FAM STUD, V3, P69, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF02233912
[8]   ATTRITION IN PREVENTION RESEARCH [J].
HANSEN, WB ;
COLLINS, LM ;
MALOTTE, CK ;
JOHNSON, CA ;
FIELDING, JE .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1985, 8 (03) :261-275
[9]   DROPPING OUT OF CHILD-PSYCHOTHERAPY - DISTINGUISHING EARLY AND LATE DROPOUTS OVER THE COURSE OF TREATMENT [J].
KAZDIN, AE ;
MAZURICK, JL .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 62 (05) :1069-1074
[10]   CAN WE STUDY (TREAT) BORDERLINE PATIENTS - ATTRITION FROM RESEARCH AND OPEN TREATMENT [J].
KELLY, T ;
SOLOFF, PH ;
CORNELIUS, J ;
GEORGE, A ;
LIS, JA ;
ULRICH, R .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 1992, 6 (04) :417-433