The use of clomiphene citrate/human menopausal gonadotrophins in conjunction with GnRH antagonist in an IVF/ICSI program is not a cost effective protocol

被引:20
作者
Mansour, RT
Aboulghar, MA
Serour, GI
Al-Inany, HG
Fahmy, I
Amin, Y
机构
[1] Egyptian IVF ET Ctr, Maadi, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cairo, Egypt
关键词
GnRH antagonist; clomiphene citrate; human monopausal gonadotrophins; in vitro fertilisation; cost effectiveness;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0412.2003.820108.x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective. To evaluate the cost effectiveness of a clomiphene citrate (CC)/human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG)/GnRH antagonist protocol versus a long-acting GnRH agonist/hMG protocol. Participants & Methods. One hundred eighty nine couples having their first trial of ICSI for male factor infertility were divided into two groups. Group I (no = 33) received CC 100-150 mg/day for five days starting from day 2 of the cycle and 150 IU of hMG/day on days 6-10. GnRH antagonist (Centrorelix) 0.25 mg/day was started when the leading follicle reached 16 mm in the absence of an LH surge. Group II (no = 156) received 0.1 mg Deacapeptyl/day as our standard long protocol. Results. Clinical pregnancy was observed in 8 out of the 33 cases in group I (24%) while in group II, 92 out of 156 achieved clinical pregnancy (59%), the difference was statistically significant (P = 0.019). The cost of medications/cycle was estimated to be 1110+/-492 E.P in group I, while it was 1928+/-456 E.P. in group II. However, the total cost per pregnancy was 19653 EP in group I and 10047 EP in group II. Conclusion. The use of the clomid/hMG/antagonist protocol is not a cost effective strategy and should not be recommended in IVF-ICSI cycles.
引用
收藏
页码:48 / 52
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Ovarian stimulation with HMG:: results of a prospective randomized phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin [J].
Albano, C ;
Felberbaum, RE ;
Smitz, J ;
Riethmüller-Winzen, H ;
Engel, J ;
Diedrich, K ;
Devroey, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (03) :526-531
[2]  
Belaisch-Allart J, 1998, CONTRACEPT FERTIL S, V26, P473
[3]  
Borm G, 2000, HUM REPROD, V15, P1490
[4]   Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered 'difficult responders' to GnRH agonist protocols? [J].
Craft, I ;
Gorgy, A ;
Hill, J ;
Menon, D ;
Podsiadly, B .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (12) :2959-2962
[5]   SUPPRESSION OF THE ENDOGENOUS LUTEINIZING-HORMONE SURGE BY THE GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE ANTAGONIST CETRORELIX DURING OVARIAN STIMULATION [J].
DIEDRICH, K ;
DIEDRICH, C ;
SANTOS, E ;
ZOLL, C ;
ALHASANI, S ;
REISSMANN, T ;
KREBS, D ;
KLINGMULLER, D .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1994, 9 (05) :788-791
[6]  
FIVNAT, 1997, Contracept Fertil Sex, V25, P499
[7]   Experience with GnRH agonists in an in vitro fertilization (IVF) program [J].
Forsdahl, Finn ;
Holst, Nicolai ;
Hansen, Lars Jul ;
Bertheussen, Kjell .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1991, 70 (4-5) :339-342
[8]   Cost-effectiveness of in vitro fertilization [J].
Goldfarb, JN ;
Austin, C ;
Lisbona, H ;
Peskin, B ;
Clapp, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (01) :18-21
[9]   Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists [J].
Hernandez, ER .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2000, 15 (06) :1211-1216
[10]  
Hugues J N, 1997, Contracept Fertil Sex, V25, P445