Reconsidering reproductive benefit through newborn screening: a systematic review of guidelines on preconception, prenatal and newborn screening

被引:41
作者
Bombard, Yvonne [1 ]
Miller, Fiona A. [1 ]
Hayeems, Robin Z. [1 ]
Avard, Denise [2 ]
Knoppers, Bartha M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Med, Dept Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON V5Z 4H4, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Fac Med, Dept Human Genet, Ctr Genom & Policy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
newborn screening; reproductive risk information; policy; ethics; informed decision making; DUCHENNE MUSCULAR-DYSTROPHY; CRITERIA; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1038/ejhg.2010.13
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The expansion of newborn screening (NBS) has been accompanied by debate about what benefits should be achieved and the role of parental discretion in their pursuit. The opportunity to inform parents of reproductive risks is among the most valued additional benefits gained through NBS, and assumes prominence where the primary goal of identifying a treatable condition is not assured. We reviewed 53 unique guidelines addressing prenatal, preconception and newborn screening to examine: (1) how generating reproductive risk information is construed as a benefit of screening; and (2) what conditions support the realization of this benefit. Most preconception and prenatal guidelines - where generating reproductive risk information is described as a primary benefit - required that individuals be given a 'cascade of choices', ensuring that each step in the decision-making process was well informed, from deciding to pursue information about reproductive risks to deciding how to manage them. With the exception of three guidelines, NBS policy infrequently attended to the potential for reproductive benefits; further, most guidelines that acknowledged such benefits construed voluntarism narrowly, without attention to the choices attendant on receiving reproductive risk information. This review suggests that prenatal and preconception guidance identifies a coherent framework to support the pursuit of reproductive benefits through population screening programmes. Interestingly, attention to reproductive benefits is increasing among NBS guidance, yet reflection on how such benefits ought to be pursued remains limited. Traditional norms for NBS may require reconsideration where the remit of screening exceeds the primary goal of clinical benefits for infants. European Journal of Human Genetics (2010) 18, 751-760; doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2010.13; published online 3 March 2010
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 760
页数:10
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   A vision of the future of newborn screening [J].
Alexander, D ;
van Dyck, PC .
PEDIATRICS, 2006, 117 (05) :S350-S354
[2]  
*AM COLL MED GEN, 2005, NEWB SCREEN UN SCREE
[3]  
Andrews L., 1994, ASSESSING GENETIC RI, DOI [10.17226/2057, DOI 10.17226/2057]
[4]  
[Anonymous], NEON SCREEN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, SCREEN HOP HYP
[6]  
Australian Law Reform Commission, 2003, Report No 96
[7]   New born screening for developmental disabilities: Reframing presumptive benefit [J].
Bailey, DB ;
Skinner, D ;
Warren, SF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2005, 95 (11) :1889-1893
[8]  
BAILEY DB, 2006, MENT RETARD DEV D R, V12, P10
[9]   Ethical, legal, and social concerns about expanded newborn screening: Fragile X syndrome as a prototype for emerging issues [J].
Bailey, Donald B., Jr. ;
Skinner, Debra ;
Davis, Arlene M. ;
Whitmarsh, Ian ;
Powell, Cynthia .
PEDIATRICS, 2008, 121 (03) :E693-E704
[10]   THE EXPANSION OF NEWBORN SCREENING: IS REPRODUCTIVE BENEFIT AN APPROPRIATE PURSUIT? [J].
Bombard, Yvonne ;
Miller, Fiona A. ;
Hayeems, Robin Z. ;
Avard, Denise ;
Knoppers, Bartha M. ;
Cornel, Martina C. ;
Borry, Pascal .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2009, 10 (10) :666-667