Gait analysis after successful mobile bearing total ankle replacement

被引:78
作者
Doets, H. Cornelis
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Houdijk, Han
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
Veeger, H. E. J. Dirkjan
机构
[1] Slotervaart Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, NL-1066 EC Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Inst Fundamental & Clin Movement Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Leiden Univ, Ctr Med, Dept Orthopaed, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
ankle; gait analysis; total ankle arthroplasty;
D O I
10.3113/FAI.2007.0313
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The effect of total ankle replacement on gait is not fully known in terms of joint kinematics, ground reaction force, and activity of the muscles of the lower leg. Methods: A comparative gait study was done in 10 patients after uneventful unilateral mobile-bearing total ankle replacement and 10 healthy controls. A rigid body model was used to describe the motion of the knee and the three-dimensional motion of the ankle-hindfoot complex during barefoot walking. An opto-electronic motion analysis system was used to analyze bilateral movement patterns, synchronized with recordings of the ipsilateral vertical ground reaction forces and the electromyographic activity of four lower leg muscles. Results: Velocity was 6% lower in the patient group. Dorsiflexion in the operated ankles was reduced (p < 0.001). No differences were found in the joint angular pattern of the knee joint and only minimal changes were found at the hindfoot-to-tibia and forefoot-to-hindfoot levels. The ground reaction force at midstance was somewhat increased (p = 0.005), while the magnitude of the vertical peak at terminal stance was decreased (p < 0.001). EMG activity patterns in the patient group were normal except for a higher activity of the gastrocnemius in early stance and the anterior tibial muscle in late stance. Conclusions: There is a near normal gait pattern in terms of joint kinematics of the knee, ankle, and foot after uneventful mobile-bearing total ankle replacement. The ground reaction forces and the EMG activity, however, do not fully normalize.
引用
收藏
页码:313 / 322
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
BEUCHEL FF, 1992, SEMIN ANTHR, V3, P43
[2]   The effect of tibio-talar arthrodesis on foot kinematics and ground reaction force progression during walking [J].
Beyaert, C ;
Sirveaux, F ;
Paysant, J ;
Molé, D ;
André, JM .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2004, 20 (01) :84-91
[3]   Midterm results of the Salto Total Ankle prosthesis [J].
Bonnin, M ;
Judet, T ;
Colombier, JA ;
Buscayret, F ;
Graveleau, N ;
Piriou, P .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (424) :6-18
[4]   THE OPTIMUM POSITION OF ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE - A GAIT STUDY OF THE KNEE AND ANKLE [J].
BUCK, P ;
MORREY, BF ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (07) :1052-1062
[5]   Twenty-year evaluation of cementless, mobile-bearing total ankle replacements [J].
Buechel, FF ;
Buechel, FF ;
Pappas, MJ .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2004, (424) :19-26
[6]   NEW-JERSEY LOW CONTACT STRESS TOTAL ANKLE REPLACEMENT - BIOMECHANICAL RATIONALE AND REVIEW OF 23 CEMENTLESS CASES [J].
BUECHEL, FF ;
PAPPAS, MJ ;
IORIO, LJ .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1988, 8 (06) :279-290
[7]   Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for post-traumatic arthritis [J].
Coester, LM ;
Saltzman, CL ;
Leupold, J ;
Pontarelli, W .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2001, 83A (02) :219-228
[8]   Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry - Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics [J].
Della Croce, U ;
Leardini, A ;
Chiari, L ;
Cappozzo, A .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2005, 21 (02) :226-237
[9]   Total ankle arthroplasty in inflammatory joint disease with use of two mobile-bearing designs [J].
Doets, H. Cornelis ;
Brand, Ronald ;
Nelissen, Rob G. H. H. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2006, 88A (06) :1272-1284
[10]   Functional evaluation of the Scandinavian Total Ankle Replacement [J].
Dyrby, C ;
Chou, LB ;
Andriacchi, TP ;
Mann, RA .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 25 (06) :377-381