Feedback-based control for providing real-time services with the 802.11e MAC

被引:73
作者
Boggia, Gennaro [1 ]
Camarda, Pietro [1 ]
Grieco, Luigi Alfredo [1 ]
Mascolo, Saverio [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Bari, Dipartimento Elettrotecn & Elettron, I-70125 Bari, Italy
关键词
real-time applications; QoS; wireless networks;
D O I
10.1109/TNET.2007.892881
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The 802.11e working group has recently proposed the hybrid coordination function (HCF) to provide service differentiation for supporting real-time transmissions over 802.11 WLANs. The HCF is made of a contention-based channel access, known as enhanced distributed coordination access, and of a HCF controlled channel access (HCCA), which requires a Hybrid Coordinator for bandwidth allocation to nodes hosting applications with QoS requirements. The 802.11e proposal includes a simple scheduler providing a Constant Bit Rate service, which is not well suited for bursty media flows. This paper proposes two feedback-based bandwidth allocation algorithms to be used within the HCCA, which have been referred to as feedback based dynamic scheduler (FBDS) and proportional-integral (PI)-FBDS. These algorithms have been designed with the objective of providing services with bounded delays. Given that the 802.11e standard allows queue lengths to be fed back, a control theoretic approach has been employed to design the FBDS, which exploits a simple proportional controller, and the PI-FBDS, which implements a proportional-integral controller. Proposed algorithms can be easily implemented since their computational complexities scale linearly with the number of traffic streams. Moreover, a call admission control scheme has been proposed as an extension of the one described in the 802.11e draft. Performance of the proposed algorithms have been theoretically analyzed and computer simulations, using the ns-2 simulator, have been carried out to compare their behaviors in realistic scenarios where video, voice, and FTP flows, coexist at various network loads. Simulation results have shown that, unlike the simple scheduler of the 802.11e draft, both FBDS and PI-FBDS are able to provide services with real-time constraints. However, while the FBDS admits a smaller quota of traffic streams than the simple scheduler, PI-FBDS allows the same quota of traffic that would be admitted using the simple scheduler, but still providing delay bound guarantees.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 333
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Allman M., 1999, 2581 RFC
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, 80211G IEEE
[3]   FHCF: A simple and efficient scheduling scheme for IEEE 802.11e wireless LAN [J].
Ansel, P ;
Ni, Q ;
Turletti, T .
MOBILE NETWORKS & APPLICATIONS, 2006, 11 (03) :391-403
[4]  
Astrom K. J., 1995, COMPUTER CONTROLLED
[5]  
Banchs A, 2003, TELETRAF SCI ENG, V5A-B, P1001
[6]   Performance analysis,of the IEEE 802.11 distributed coordination function [J].
Bianchi, G .
IEEE JOURNAL ON SELECTED AREAS IN COMMUNICATIONS, 2000, 18 (03) :535-547
[7]   Analysis of priority mechanisms based on differentiated Inter Frame Spacing in CSMA-CA [J].
Bianchi, G ;
Tinnirello, I .
2003 IEEE 58TH VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS1-5, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, :1401-1405
[8]  
Blake Steven, 1998, 2475 IETF RFC
[9]   Feedback-based bandwidth allocation with call admission control for providing delay guarantees in IEEE 802.11e networks [J].
Boggia, G ;
Camarda, P ;
Grieco, LA ;
Mascolo, S .
COMPUTER COMMUNICATIONS, 2005, 28 (03) :325-337
[10]  
BRADEN R, 1994, 1633 IETF RFC