A prospective randomized multicentre phase III trial of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation versus fotemustine alone in cerebral metastases of maliqnant melanoma

被引:97
作者
Mornex, F
Thomas, L
Mohr, P
Hauschild, A
Delaunay, MM
Lesimple, T
Tilgen, W
Bui, BN
Guillot, B
Ulrich, J
Bourdin, S
Mousseau, M
Cupissol, D
Bonneterre, ME
de Gislain, C
Bensadoun, RJ
Clavel, M
机构
[1] Ctr Hosp Lyon Sud, Serv Radiotherapie Oncol, F-69495 Pierre Benite, France
[2] Hop Hotel Dieu, F-69288 Lyon, France
[3] Kreiskrankenhaus, Buxtehude, Germany
[4] Univ Kiel, Hautklin, Kiel, Germany
[5] Grp Hosp Pellegrin Tripode, Bordeaux, France
[6] Ctr Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France
[7] Univ Haut & Poliklin, Homburg, Germany
[8] Fdn Bergonie, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[9] Hop Caremeau, Nimes, France
[10] Univ Magdeburg, Hautklin, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[11] Ctr Rene Gauducheau, St Herblain, France
[12] CHRU Tronche, Grenoble, France
[13] Ctr Paul Lamarque, Montpellier, France
[14] Ctr Oscar Lambret, F-59020 Lille, France
[15] Ctr Georges Francois Leclerc, Dijon, France
[16] Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, F-06054 Nice, France
[17] Ctr Leon Berard, F-69373 Lyon, France
关键词
brain metastases; fotemustine; melanoma; radiotherapy;
D O I
10.1097/00008390-200302000-00016
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The main objective of this prospective multicentre randomized phase III study was to compare a combined regimen of fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation with fotemustine alone in terms of cerebral response and time to cerebral progression in patients with melanoma cerebral metastases. Seventy-six patients were randomized to receive either fotemustine (arm A, n = 39) or fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation (arm B, n = 37). Fotemustine was administered intravenously at 100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by a 5 week rest period, then every 3 weeks in non-progressive patients. In arm B, concomitant whole brain irradiation was performed at a total dose of 37.5 Gy (2.5 Gy/day on days 1-5 for three consecutive weeks). Although patients who received fotemustine alone had worse prognostic factors, there was no significant difference in cerebral response (arm A, 7.4%, arm B, 10.0%) or control rates (objective responses plus stable disease) after 7 weeks (arm A, 30%; arm 13, 47%) or in overall survival (arm A, 86 days; arm B, 105 days). However, there was a significant difference in favour of arm B for the time to cerebral progression (P = 0.028, Wilcoxon test). In conclusion, fotemustine plus whole brain irradiation delayed the time to cerebral progression of melanoma cerebral metastases compared with fotemustine alone but without a significant improvement in terms of objective control or overall survival.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 103
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
BALCH CM, 1992, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, P165
[2]  
Balch CM, 1992, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, V1, P439
[3]  
Brocker EB, 1996, MELANOMA RES, V6, P399
[4]   MULTICENTER PHASE-II TRIAL OF THE SINGLE AGENT FOTEMUSTINE IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED MALIGNANT-MELANOMA [J].
CALABRESI, F ;
AAPRO, M ;
BECQUART, D ;
DIRIX, L ;
WILS, J ;
ARDIZZONI, A ;
GERARD, B .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1991, 2 (05) :377-378
[5]  
CARELLA RJ, 1980, CANCER, V45, P679, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19800215)45:4<679::AID-CNCR2820450410>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-J
[7]   IDENTIFICATION OF AN OPTIMAL SUBGROUP FOR TREATMENT EVALUATION OF PATIENTS WITH BRAIN METASTASES USING RTOG STUDY-7916 [J].
DIENERWEST, M ;
DOBBINS, TW ;
PHILLIPS, TL ;
NELSON, DF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (03) :669-673
[8]   Cerebral metastases of cutaneous melanoma [J].
Gupta, G ;
Robertson, AG ;
MacKie, RM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 76 (02) :256-259
[9]  
Houghton AN, 1992, CUTANEOUS MELANOMA, V1, P468
[10]   CHEMOTHERAPY BY FOTEMUSTINE IN CEREBRAL METASTASES OF DISSEMINATED MALIGNANT-MELANOMA [J].
JACQUILLAT, C ;
KHAYAT, D ;
BANZET, P ;
WEIL, M ;
AVRIL, MF ;
FUMOLEAU, P ;
NAMER, M ;
BONNETERRE, J ;
KERBRAT, P ;
BONERANDI, JJ ;
BUGAT, R ;
MONTCUQUET, P ;
AUDHUY, B ;
CUPISSOL, D ;
LAUVIN, R ;
GROSSHANS, E ;
VILMER, C ;
PRACHE, C ;
BIZZARI, JP .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1990, 25 (04) :263-266