Baseload wind energy: modeling the competition between gas turbines and compressed air energy storage for supplemental generation

被引:165
作者
Greenblatt, Jeffery B. [1 ]
Succar, Samir
Denkenberger, David C.
Williams, Robert H.
Socolow, Robert H.
机构
[1] Environm Def, Oakland, CA USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Inst Environm, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Univ Colorado, Dept Civil Environm & Architectural Engn, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[4] Princeton Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
wind energy; compressed air energy storage (CAES); greenhouse gas emissions;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2006.03.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The economic viability of producing baseload wind energy was explored using a cost-optimization model to simulate two competing systems: wind energy supplemented by simple- and combined cycle natural gas turbines ("wind+ gas"), and wind energy supplemented by compressed air energy storage ("wind+CAES"). Pure combined cycle natural gas turbines ("gas") were used as a proxy for conventional baseload generation. Long-distance electric transmission was integral to the analysis. Given the future uncertainty in both natural gas price and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions price, we introduced an effective fuel price, P-NGeff, being the sum of the real natural gas price and the GHG price. Under the assumption of P-NGeff = $5/GJ (lower heating value), 650 W/m(2) wind resource, 750 km transmission line, and a fixed 90% capacity factor, wind + CAES was the most expensive system at phi 6.0/kWh, and did not break even with the next most expensive wind + gas system until P-NGeff = $9.0/GJ. However, under real market conditions, the system with the least dispatch cost (short-run marginal cost) is dispatched first, attaining the highest capacity factor and diminishing the capacity factors of competitors, raising their total cost. We estimate that the wind + CAES system, with a greenhouse gas (GHG) emission rate that is one-fourth of that for natural gas combined cycle plants and about one-tenth of that for pulverized coal plants, has the lowest dispatch cost of the alternatives considered (lower even than for coal power plants) above a GHG emissions price of $35/tC(equiv), with good prospects for realizing a higher capacity factor and a lower total cost of energy than all the competing technologies over a wide range of effective fuel costs. This ability to compete in economic dispatch greatly boosts the market penetration potential of wind energy and suggests a substantial growth opportunity for natural gas in providing baseload power via wind + CAES, even at high natural gas prices. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1474 / 1492
页数:19
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Evaluation of global wind power [J].
Archer, CL ;
Jacobson, MZ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2005, 110 (D12) :1-20
[2]  
BELL LD, 2003, 991626ELBGN OPSB
[3]  
*BP, 2005, INTR DEC FUELS
[4]  
*BTM CONS APS, 2004, INT WIND EN DEV WORL
[5]  
BULLOUGH C, 2004, P EUR WIND ENG C LON
[6]  
CAVALLO A, 1995, WIND ENERGY BOOK, V16, P119
[7]   HIGH-CAPACITY FACTOR WIND ENERGY-SYSTEMS [J].
CAVALLO, AJ .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1995, 117 (02) :137-143
[8]   Wind turbine cost of electricity and capacity factor [J].
Cavallo, AJ .
JOURNAL OF SOLAR ENERGY ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1997, 119 (04) :312-314
[9]  
CAVALLO AJ, 1996, P EUR UN WIND EN C 2
[10]  
*CHIC CLIM EXCH, 2005, CCX CARB MARK REP, V2