Ethical issues in identifying and recruiting participants for familial genetic research

被引:38
作者
Beskow, LM
Botkin, JR
Daly, M
Juengst, ET
Lehmann, LS
Merz, JF
Pentz, R
Press, NA
Ross, LF
Sugarman, J
Susswein, LR
Terry, SF
Austin, MA
Burke, W
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Adm, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[3] Univ Utah, Sch Med, Dept Med Eth, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Family Risk Assessment Program, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[5] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Biomed Eth, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Gen Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Div Med Eth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[8] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Bioeth, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[9] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[10] Oregon Hlth Sci Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Prevent Med, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[11] Univ Chicago, Dept Pediat, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[12] Univ Chicago, MacLean Ctr Clin Med Eth, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[13] Johns Hopkins Univ, Phoebe R Berman Bioeth Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[14] Univ N Carolina, Canc Genet Network, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27515 USA
[15] Gen Alliance & PXE Int Inc, Washington, DC USA
[16] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[17] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Inst Publ Hlth Genet, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[18] Univ Washington, Dept Med Hist & Eth, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A | 2004年 / 130A卷 / 04期
关键词
family-based research; research recruitment; ethics; genetics; cancer;
D O I
10.1002/ajmg.a.30234
中图分类号
Q3 [遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Family-based research is essential to understanding the genetic and environmental etiology of human disease. The success of family-based research often depends on investigators' ability to identify, recruit, and achieve a high participation rate among eligible family members. However, recruitment of family members raises ethical concerns due to the tension between protecting participants' privacy and promoting research quality, and guidelines for these activities are not well established. The Cancer Genetics Network Bioethics Committee assembled a multidisciplinary group to explore the scientific and ethical issues that arise in the process of family-based recruitment. The group used a literature review as well as expert opinion to develop recommendations about appropriate approaches to identifying, contacting, and recruiting family members. We conclude that there is no single correct approach, but recommend a balanced approach that takes into account the nature of the particular study as well as its recruitment goals. Recruitment of family members should be viewed as part of the research protocol and should require appropriate informed consent of the already-enrolled participant. Investigators should inform prospective participants why they are being contacted, how information about them was obtained, and what will happen to that information if they decide not to participate. The recruitment process should also be sensitive to the fact that some individuals from families at increased genetic risk will have no prior knowledge of their risk status. These recommendations are put forward to promote further discussion about the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches to family-based recruitment. They suggest a framework for considering alternative recruitment strategies and their implications, as well as highlight areas in need of further empirical research. (C) 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:424 / 431
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   ETHICAL ISSUES IN GENETIC-LINKAGE STUDIES OF PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS [J].
ALEXANDER, JR ;
LERER, B ;
BARON, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1992, 160 :98-102
[3]   Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics [J].
Beskow, LM ;
Burke, W ;
Merz, JF ;
Barr, PA ;
Terry, S ;
Penchaszadeh, VB ;
Gostin, LO ;
Gwinn, M ;
Khoury, MJ .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 286 (18) :2315-2321
[4]   The art of recruitment: The foundation of family and linkage studies of psychiatric illness [J].
Bonvicini, KA .
FAMILY PROCESS, 1998, 37 (02) :153-165
[5]   A model protocol for evaluating the behavioral and psychosocial effects of BRCA1 testing - Commentary [J].
Botkin, JR ;
Croyle, RT ;
Smith, KR ;
Baty, BJ ;
Lerman, C ;
Goldgar, DE ;
Ward, JM ;
Flick, BJ ;
Nash, JE .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (13) :872-882
[6]   Protecting the privacy of family members in survey and pedigree research [J].
Botkin, JR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (02) :207-211
[7]   TRANSPARENCY - INFORMED CONSENT IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
BRODY, H .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1989, 19 (05) :5-9
[8]   Participation in the cooperative family registry for breast cancer studies: Issues of informed consent [J].
Daly, MB ;
Offit, K ;
Li, F ;
Glendon, G ;
Yaker, A ;
West, D ;
Koenig, B ;
McCredie, M ;
Venne, V ;
Nayfield, S ;
Seminara, D .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (06) :452-456
[9]   FAMILY STUDIES - THE KEY TO UNDERSTANDING THE GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL ETIOLOGY OF CHRONIC DISEASE [J].
DORMAN, JS ;
TRUCCO, M ;
LAPORTE, RE ;
KULLER, LH .
GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 5 (05) :305-310
[10]   The role of community review in evaluating the risks of human genetic variation research [J].
Foster, MW ;
Sharp, RR ;
Freeman, WL ;
Chino, M ;
Bernsten, D ;
Carter, TH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 64 (06) :1719-1727