Gasless videoendoscopic implantation of aortobifemoral vascular prostheses via transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal approach in an animal model

Background: The goal of this acute experimental study was to demonstrate the practicability and reproducibility of aortobifemoral bifurcational prosthesis implantations via either a transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach using gasless videoendoscopic instrumentation. The endoscopically sutured end-to-side aortic anastomoses were also examined for fluid tightness. Methods: Eighteen of the 20 domestic pigs in this experimental study received aortobifemoral vascular prostheses in a gasless videoendoscopic procedure. Bursting pressures and leakage (ml/min) were compared for the endoscopically sutured aortic end-to-side anastomoses versus those sutured in conventional techniques using 6-h-old porcine aortas and 6-mm prostheses. Results: The surgical procedures averaged 4 h for the transperitoneal approach (n = 9) and 4.5 h for the extraperitoneal approach (n = 9). However, these times were significantly reduced with increasing routine. Average aortic occlusion times were 1 h for the transperitoneal approach and 1 h 15 min for the extraperitoneal approach; the average iliacofemoral occlusion time ranged from 1 h 45 min with the transperitoneal approach to 1 h 15 min with the extraperitoneal approach, depending on which side was involved. There were no significant differences in in vitro bursting pressure or leakage amounts between endoscopic and conventionally sutured aortic end-to-side anastomoses. Conclusions: Gasless videoendoscopic implantation of aortobifemoral vascular prostheses in animal subjects is both practicable and reproducible using either a transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach. The extraperitoneal approach has proven advantages over the transperitoneal approach. The in vitro fluid tightness achieved with endoscopically sutured aortic end-to-side anastomoses is comparable to conventionally sutured anastomoses.