A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management

被引:307
作者
Loisel, P
Abenhaim, L
Durand, P
Esdaile, JM
Suissa, S
Gosselin, L
Simard, R
Turcotte, J
Lemaire, J
机构
[1] Greenfield Pk Univ Sherbrooke, Hop Charles LeMoyne, Dept Surg, Div Orthoped Surg, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[2] Greenfield Pk Univ Sherbrooke, Hop Charles LeMoyne, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[3] Greenfield Pk Univ Sherbrooke, Hop Charles LeMoyne, Ctr Rech Clin, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Ecole Relat Ind, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
[5] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[6] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Community Studies, Montreal, PQ H3A 2T5, Canada
[7] Dept Publ Hlth, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] Univ British Columbia, Mary Pack Arthrit Ctr, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
back pain; ergonomics; health care delivery; randomized controlled trial; rehabilitation; worker's compensation;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199712150-00014
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Population-based randomized clinical trial. Objectives. To develop and test a model of management of subacute back pain, to prevent prolonged disability. Summary of Background Data. The present management of back pain seems inadequate, and development of innovative models has been urged. Methods. A model for the treatment of subacute work-related back pain has been developed and evaluated in a population-based randomized clinical trial. Workers (n = 130) from eligible workplaces in the Sherbrooke area (N = 31), who had been absent from work for more than 4 weeks for back pain, were randomized, based on their workplace, in one of four treatment groups: usual care, clinical intervention, occupational intervention, and full intervention (a combination of the last two). The duration of absence from regular work and from any work was evaluated using survival analysis. Functional status and pain were compared at study entry and after 1 year of follow-up. Results. The full intervention group returned to regular work 2.41 times faster than the usual care intervention group (95% confidence interval 1.19-4.89; P = 0.01). The specific effect of the occupational intervention accounted for the most important part of this result, with a rate ratio of return to regular work of 1.91 (95% confidence interval = 1.18-3.10; P < 0.01). Pain and disability scales demonstrated either a statistically significant reduction or a trend toward reduction in the three intervention groups, compared with the trend in the usual care intervention group. Conclusions. Close association of occupational intervention with clinical care is of primary importance in impeding progression toward chronicity of low back pain.
引用
收藏
页码:2911 / 2918
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ABENHAIM L, 1987, J OCCUP ENVIRON MED, V29, P670
[2]  
[Anonymous], SAS STAT US GUID VER
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, TOP ACUTE CARE TRAUM
[4]   THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE - DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL REVISION OF A HEALTH-STATUS MEASURE [J].
BERGNER, M ;
BOBBITT, RA ;
CARTER, WB ;
GILSON, BS .
MEDICAL CARE, 1981, 19 (08) :787-805
[5]  
BIGOS SJ, 1990, SPINE, V16, P1
[6]  
DELVECCHIOGOOD MJ, 1979, J FAM PRACTICE, V8, P577
[7]  
Fairbank J C, 1980, Physiotherapy, V66, P271
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF COMPENSATION ON RECOVERY FROM LOW-BACK INJURY [J].
GREENOUGH, CG ;
FRASER, RD .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (09) :947-955
[9]  
HART CWM, 1992, HLTH SERVICES RES AN, P29
[10]   SPINE UPDATE - FUNCTIONAL DISABILITY SCALES FOR BACK PAIN [J].
KOPEC, JA ;
ESDAILE, JM .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (17) :1943-1949