Antipartyism and third-party vote choice -: A comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia

The effect of antiparty sentiment on voting behaviour is examined comparatively using recent individual-level electoral survey data from Canada, Britain, and Australia. The author distinguishes two dimensions of antipartyism: the rejection of traditional major-party alternatives (specific antiparty sentiment) and of political parties per se (generalized antiparty sentiment). He argues that disaffected voters in these countries are attracted to third or minor parties and support them to voice antiparty sentiments. The results show that in general, third parties benefit from specific antiparty sentiment at the mass level. The rejection of party politics per se, in contrast, brings citizens to abstain, unless some third parties-antiparty parties such as the Reform Party in Canada and One Nation in Australia-electorally mobilize generalized antiparty feelings. The results also indicate that compulsory voting in Australia affects disaffected voters' behaviour; in particular, those who reject all party alternatives would be more likely to abstain if they had the choice.