The Easterlin hypothesis in the recent experience of higher-income OECD countries: A panel-data approach

被引:19
作者
Jeon, Y [1 ]
Shields, MP [1 ]
机构
[1] Cent Michigan Univ, Dept Econ, Mt Pleasant, MI 48859 USA
关键词
cohort; fertility; panel;
D O I
10.1007/s00148-004-0190-5
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
The Easterlin hypothesis emphasizes the effect of relative cohort size on fertility. Models based on the Easterlin hypothesis have performed well in explaining time series fertility data, although these results have been for long historical time series and have typically been restricted to single country studies. These models are not adequate to determine if the hypothesis still holds and if the success of the Easterlin hypothesis is an artifact of the time period chosen. We use panel data analysis and temporal causality tests to see of the Easterlin hypothesis holds for higher-income OECD countries. The results support the Easterlin hypothesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], I CONTEXT POPULATION
[2]  
BUTZ W, 1979, AM EC REV JUN, P318
[3]   The global fertility transition: The need for a unifying theory [J].
Caldwell, JC .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1997, 23 (04) :803-+
[4]   RECENT COURSE OF FERTILITY IN WESTERN-EUROPE [J].
CALOT, G ;
BLAYO, C .
POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1982, 36 (03) :349-372
[5]   INVERTED EASTERLIN FERTILITY CYCLES AND KORNAI SOFT BUDGET CONSTRAINT [J].
CARLSON, E .
POPULATION AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 1992, 18 (04) :669-688
[6]   Jointly determined saving and fertility behaviour: Theory, and estimates for Germany, Italy, UK and USA [J].
Cigno, A ;
Rosati, FC .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 40 (08) :1561-1589
[7]   ECONOMETRIC-ANALYSIS OF BIRTH-RATE DYNAMICS IN BRITAIN [J].
ERMISCH, J .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1988, 23 (04) :563-576
[8]  
ERMISCH JF, 1980, OXFORD B ECON STAT, V42, P125
[9]  
ERMISCH JF, 1979, POPULATION STUDIES, V33
[10]   Family benefits and fertility: An econometric analysis [J].
Gauthier, AH ;
Hatzius, J .
POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1997, 51 (03) :295-+