Pitfalls and limitations of magnetic resonance imaging in chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis

被引:53
作者
Ledermann, HP [1 ]
Kaim, A [1 ]
Bongartz, G [1 ]
Steinbrich, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Radiol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis; MR imaging; CT; metal artefact;
D O I
10.1007/s003300000480
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to evaluate pitfalls and technical limitations of MR imaging in diagnosing relapse of chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis of the lower extremities. Retrospective analysis of MR examinations in 15 patients (17 body areas) with suspected relapse of chronic posttraumatic osteomyelitis (at least 1.5 years duration/mean number of surgical procedures per patient: 5.8). The MRI findings were compared with postoperative bacteriology (n = 11) and clinical follow-up (n = 4). Five patients had additional CT examination. Magnetic resonance imaging identified all infected areas correctly, but five uninfected regions were diagnosed false positive due to postoperative scarring/oedema in bone defects (n = 4) and soft tissue (n = 1). Specificity of MRI in diagnosing active bone infection was 63 % and sensitivity 100 %. Additional CT was preoperatively necessary in 5 patients (33 %) to further examine osteomyelitic and reparative bone remodeling. Metal artefacts were present in 11 patients, rendering complete evaluation impossible (n = 2) or considerably more difficult (n = 4). Scarring/oedema in postoperative bone defects occurs up to 13 months postoperatively and represents a major pitfall leading to low specificity. Definitive evaluation of suspected fistula, bony fragments and mineralization by MRI may be limited in this special patient group and requires additional CT in one third of patients. Metal artefacts occur in most patients and may impair or even prevent correct film evaluation in 23 and 11%, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:1815 / 1823
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   INFECTIONS OF THE MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM - HIGH-FIELD-STRENGTH MR IMAGING [J].
BELTRAN, J ;
NOTO, AM ;
MCGHEE, RB ;
FREEDY, RM ;
MCCALLA, MS .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 164 (02) :449-454
[2]  
BELTRAN J, 1990, SKELETAL RADIOL, V19, P37
[3]  
BERQUIST T H, 1985, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, V3, P219, DOI 10.1016/0730-725X(85)90350-9
[4]  
CRIM JR, 1994, CRIT REV DIAGN IMAG, V35, P201
[5]   MRI IN THE DETECTION OF MALIGNANT INFILTRATION OF BONE-MARROW [J].
DAFFNER, RH ;
LUPETIN, AR ;
DASH, N ;
DEEB, ZL ;
SEFCZEK, RJ ;
SCHAPIRO, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 146 (02) :353-358
[6]   MULTIMODALITY IMAGING OF OSTEOMYELITIS [J].
ELGAZZAR, AH ;
ABDELDAYEM, HM ;
CLARK, JD ;
MAXON, HR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1995, 22 (09) :1043-1063
[7]   OSTEOMYELITIS - CHARACTERISTICS AND PITFALLS OF DIAGNOSIS WITH MR IMAGING [J].
ERDMAN, WA ;
TAMBURRO, F ;
JAYSON, HT ;
WEATHERALL, PT ;
FERRY, KB ;
PESHOCK, RM .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (02) :533-539
[8]  
Hauser R, 1994, Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax, V83, P325
[9]  
HOPKINS KL, 1995, SKELETAL RADIOL, V24, P325
[10]   Can running cause the appearance of marrow edema on MR images of the foot and ankle? [J].
Lazzarini, KM ;
Troiano, RN ;
Smith, RC .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 202 (02) :540-542