Risk of Bias and Brand Explain the Observed: Inconsistency in Trials on Glucosamine Symptomatic Relief of Osteoarthritis: A Meta-Analysis of Placebeo-Controlled Trials

被引:57
作者
Eriksen, Patrick [1 ]
Bartels, Else M. [1 ]
Altman, Roy D. [2 ]
Bliddal, Henning [1 ]
Juhl, Carsten [3 ]
Christensen, Robin [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Parker Inst, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Uni Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark
关键词
BLIND CLINICAL-EVALUATION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; CHONDROITIN SULFATE; ORAL GLUCOSAMINE; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; LOW-BACK; EFFICACY; PAIN; COMBINATION; PROGRESSION;
D O I
10.1002/acr.22376
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective, To determine whether study sponsor, chemical formulation, brand of glucosamine, and/or risk of bias explain observed inconsistencies in trials of glucosa.mine's efficacy for treating pain in osteoarthritis (OA). Methods. A systematic review and stratified meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials was performed, and random-effects models were applied with inconsistency (I-2) and heterogeneity (tau(2)) estimated using Review Manager and SAS, respectively. The major outcome was reduction of pain; the standardized mean difference (SMD [95% confidence interval (95% CM) served as effect size. Results. The inclusion criteria yielded 25 trials (3,458 patients). Glucosamine moderately reduced pain (SMD -0.51 [95% CI -0.72, -0.30]), although a high level of between-trial inconsistency was observed (I-2 = 88%). The single most important explanation (i.e., covariate) was brand, reducing heterogeneity by 41% (P = 0.00032). Twelve trials (1,437 patients) using the Rottapharm/Madaus product resulted in significant pain reduction (SMD 1.07 [95% CI -1.47, -0.67]), although a sensitivity analysis of 3 low risk of bias trials using the Rottapharm/Madaus product showed less promising results (SMD -0.27 [95% CI -0.43, -0.12]), which is only a small effect size. Thirteen trials (1,963 patients) using non-Rottapharm/Madaus products consistently failed to show a reduction in pain (SMD -0.11 [95% CI -0.46, 0.24]). The second most important explanation was overall risk of bias (reducing heterogeneity by 32%). Conclusion. Most of the observed heterogeneity in glucosamine trials is explained by brand. Trials using the Rottapharm/Madaus glucosamine product had a superior outcome on pain in OA compared to other preparations of glucosamine. Large inconsistency was found, however. Low risk of bias trials, using the Rottapharrn/Madaus product, revealed a small effect size.
引用
收藏
页码:1844 / 1855
页数:12
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]
ALTMAN RD, 1991, J RHEUMATOL, V18, P10
[2]
Altman Roy D, 2009, Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol, V2, P359, DOI 10.1586/ecp.09.17
[3]
[Anonymous], EVID BASED COMPLEMEN
[4]
[Anonymous], 1997, OSTEOARTHR CARTILAGE
[5]
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence [J].
Balshem, Howard ;
Helfand, Mark ;
Schuenemann, Holger J. ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Kunz, Regina ;
Brozek, Jan ;
Vist, Gunn E. ;
Falck-Ytter, Yngve ;
Meerpohl, Joerg ;
Norris, Susan ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 64 (04) :401-406
[6]
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[7]
The treatment and prevention of knee osteoarthritis: a tool for clinical decision-making [J].
Bliddal, Henning ;
Christensen, Robin .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2009, 10 (11) :1793-1804
[8]
The effect of glucosamine supplementation on people experiencing regular knee pain [J].
Braham, R ;
Dawson, B ;
Goodman, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2003, 37 (01) :45-49
[9]
Correlation between radiographic severity of knee osteoarthritis and future disease progression. Results from a 3-year prospective, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of glucosamine sulfate [J].
Bruyere, O ;
Honore, A ;
Ethgen, O ;
Rovati, LC ;
Giacovelli, G ;
Henrotin, YE ;
Seidel, L ;
Reginster, JYL .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2003, 11 (01) :1-5
[10]
No effect of glucosamine sulfate on osteoarthritis in the temporomandibular joints-a randomized, controlled, short-term study [J].
Cahlin, Birgitta Johansson ;
Dahlstrom, Lars .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTOLOGY, 2011, 112 (06) :760-766