Multiple forms of dynamic representation

被引:144
作者
Ainsworth, S [1 ]
VanLabeke, N [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, ESRC Ctr Res Dev Instruct & Training, Sch Psychol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.002
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The terms dynamic representation and animation are often used as if they are synonymous, but in this paper we argue that there are multiple ways to represent phenomena that change over time. Time-persistent representations show a range of values over time. Time-implicit representations also show a range of values but not the specific times when the values occur. Time-singular representations show only a single point of time. In this paper, we examine the use of dynamic representations in instructional simulations. We argue that the three types of dynamic representations have distinct advantages compared to static representations. We also suggest there are specific cognitive tasks associated with their use. Furthermore, dynamic representations of different form are often displayed simultaneously. We conclude that to understand learning with multiple dynamic representations, it is crucial to consider the way in which time is displayed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 255
页数:15
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics [J].
Ainsworth, S ;
Bibby, P ;
Wood, D .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2002, 11 (01) :25-61
[2]   The functions of multiple representations [J].
Ainsworth, S .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 1999, 33 (2-3) :131-152
[3]  
AINSWORTH S, 2001, 9 EARLI C FRIB
[4]  
[Anonymous], P 16 ANN C COGN SCI
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Learning with multiple representations
[6]  
Bétrancourt M, 2000, TRAV HUMAIN, V63, P311
[7]  
Bibby P. A., 1993, Human-Computer Interaction, V8, P25, DOI 10.1207/s15327051hci0801_2
[8]  
BROWN MH, 1988, P ACM SIGCHI 88 C HU, P33, DOI [10.1145/57167, DOI 10.1145/57167]
[9]   THE SPLIT-ATTENTION EFFECT AS A FACTOR IN THE DESIGN OF INSTRUCTION [J].
CHANDLER, P ;
SWELLER, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 62 :233-246
[10]  
Cox R., 1995, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, V6, P239