Prey selection by juvenile walleye as influenced by prey morphology and behavior

被引:77
作者
Einfalt, LM
Wahl, DH
机构
[1] Illinois Nat Hist Survey, Ctr Aquat Ecol, Kaskaskia Biol Stn, Sullivan, IL 61951 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Ecol Ethol & Evolut, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1139/cjfas-54-11-2618
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Mechanisms influencing selection of prey by juvenile walleye (Stizostedion vitreum; 100-210 mm) were examined in a series of laboratory experiments. Size preference was determined in aquaria (72 L) by introducing four to six individuals (5-mm length increments) of either bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum), or golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas) with a walleye from one of five length classes. Based on prey length, walleye selected smaller bluegill (20-32% of walleye total length) than either gizzard shad (24-33%) or golden shiner (38-43%). However, body depths of selected prey were similar across species (5-9% of walleye length). Preferences did not always agree with predictions from an optimal foraging model (handling time/prey dry mass), with walleye choosing larger prey based on both length and body depth. Species preference experiments in 2-m pools showed number of prey captures were higher for gizzard shad (76%) than for golden shiner (17%) and bluegill (7%). To explain differential prey vulnerability, observations of predator and prey behavior were conducted in a 750-L tank. Mean captures per strike were highest for gizzard shad (0.41), followed by golden shiner (0.32) and bluegill(0.13). Behavior and morphology, unique to each prey species, influenced walleye predation success.
引用
收藏
页码:2618 / 2626
页数:9
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Beyerle G.B., 1978, AM FISH SOC SPEC PUB, V11, P135
[2]  
BRECK JE, 1993, T AM FISH SOC, V122, P902, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1993)122<0902:FTAPFA>2.3.CO
[3]  
2
[4]  
Buynak G.L., 1982, Proceedings of the Pennsylvania Academy of Science, V56, P26
[5]  
GILLEN AL, 1981, T AM FISH SOC, V110, P197, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1981)110&lt
[6]  
197:PBPTMO&gt
[7]  
2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   Effects of prey species composition and habitat structure on foraging by two functionally distinct piscivores [J].
Greenberg, LA ;
Paszkowski, CA ;
Tonn, WM .
OIKOS, 1995, 74 (03) :522-532
[10]  
HAMBRIGHT KD, 1991, T AM FISH SOC, V120, P500, DOI 10.1577/1548-8659(1991)120<0500:EAOPSB>2.3.CO