Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment: 2. Scaling procedures

被引:48
作者
Wenzel, RJ [1 ]
Liu, DY
Edgerton, ES
Prather, KA
机构
[1] Univ Calif Riverside, Dept Chem, Riverside, CA 92521 USA
[2] Atmospher Res & Anal Inc, Cary, NC 27513 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Diego, Scripps Inst Oceanog, Dept Chem & Biochem, La Jolla, CA 92093 USA
关键词
ATOFMS; concentration; composition; size; temporal; sulfate;
D O I
10.1029/2001JD001563
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] Aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry (ATOFMS) was used for characterizing the aerodynamic size and chemical composition of individual particles during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment in 1999. During certain time periods, increased numbers of particles scattered light but did not produce mass spectra. Upon comparison of the size-resolved unscaled particle counts from an aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometer with those from a laser particle counter, the presence of a chemical bias became apparent in the single particle mass spectral measurements. Upon further analysis, it was determined that these events occurred during time periods of elevated ammonium and sulfate mass concentrations measured with semicontinuous particulate analysis instruments. The missed particle type occurred mostly in the smallest size range (0.35-0.54 mum) and correlated well with optical scattering measurements. As described herein, a scaling procedure is developed that allows one to account for the ATOFMS chemical bias. This procedure is tested by comparing the scaled ATOFMS data with multiple measurements from other techniques made during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite study. This is the second paper in a two-part series focusing on ATOFMS data collected during the Atlanta Supersite experiment in 1999 [Prather et al., 2002].
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Particle detection efficiencies of aerosol time of flight mass spectrometers under ambient sampling conditions [J].
Allen, JO ;
Fergenson, DP ;
Gard, EE ;
Hughes, LS ;
Morrical, BD ;
Kleeman, MJ ;
Gross, DS ;
Gälli, ME ;
Prather, KA ;
Cass, GR .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (01) :211-217
[2]   Urban aerosol radiative properties: Measurements during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Experiment [J].
Carrico, CM ;
Bergin, MH ;
Xu, J ;
Baumann, K ;
Maring, H .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D7)
[3]   Instrument development and application in studies and monitoring of ambient ammonia [J].
Erisman, JW ;
Otjes, R ;
Hensen, A ;
Jongejan, P ;
van den Bulk, P ;
Khlystov, A ;
Möls, H ;
Slanina, S .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 35 (11) :1913-1922
[4]  
Finlayson-Pitts B. J., 2000, Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere
[5]   Real-time analysis of individual atmospheric aerosol particles: Design and performance of a portable ATOFMS [J].
Gard, E ;
Mayer, JE ;
Morrical, BD ;
Dienes, T ;
Fergenson, DP ;
Prather, KA .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1997, 69 (20) :4083-4091
[6]  
HINDS WC, 1998, OPTICAL MEASUREMENTS, P370
[7]   Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles [J].
Jayne, JT ;
Leard, DC ;
Zhang, XF ;
Davidovits, P ;
Smith, KA ;
Kolb, CE ;
Worsnop, DR .
AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 33 (1-2) :49-70
[8]  
Johnston MV, 2000, J MASS SPECTROM, V35, P585, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9888(200005)35:5<585::AID-JMS992>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-K
[10]   Size and composition biases on the detection of individual ultrafine particles by aerosol mass spectrometry [J].
Kane, DB ;
Johnston, MV .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (23) :4887-4893