Magnetic resonance imaging-directed transrectal ultrasonography-guided biopsies in patients at risk of prostate cancer

被引:38
作者
Lattouf, Jean-Baptiste
Grubb, Robert L., III
Lee, S. Justin
Bjurlin, Marc A.
Albert, Paul
Singh, Anurag K.
Ocak, Iclal
Choyke, Peter
Coleman, Jonathan A.
机构
[1] NCI, Urol Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[2] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, DCTD, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[3] NCI, Radiat Oncol Branch, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] NCI, Mol Imaging Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
prostate cancer; prostate biopsy; MRI; ultrasonography; cancer;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06690.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether using endorectal-coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) before transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsies of the prostate increases the yield of cancer in a high-risk population, and in a subset analysis to compare the yield with high-field (3 T) vs lower field (1.5 T) MRI. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between March 2003 and November 2005, 26 consecutive patients had erMRI before their TRUS biopsy of the prostate (median age 62 years, range 32-76). The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level was 8.40 (2.1-85.9) ng/mL. All patients had at least one previous negative prostate biopsy (median 3, range 1-12). Twenty-three patients had at least one risk factor for prostate cancer (family history, high PSA velocity, low percentage of free PSA, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypical small acinar proliferation on previous biopsy). MRI studies consisted of T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging studies. RESULTS There was a close correlation between T2-weighted and DCE images (85% agreement, P < 0.001). Neither T2-weighted nor DCE imaging correlated with a higher yield for cancer on final biopsy (T2, positive predictive value, PPV, 20%, negative PV, NPV, 14%, P = 0.21; DCE, PPV 21%, NPV 15%, P = 0.26). Combining the two methods did not improve the cancer yield. There was no significant difference in the probability of cancer based on 1.5 T or 3 T imaging (17% vs 16%, P = 0.88). CONCLUSION Although erMRI before TRUS-guided biopsies tended to give higher cancer yields the difference was not statistically significant. Reasons for this might include suboptimal localisation of the MRI findings and the biopsy location. Better methods for fusing MRI and TRUS images are presently being developed at our institution to allow more accurate targeting.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1046
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Negative prostatic biopsies in patients with a high risk of prostate cancer -: Is the combination of endorectal MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy imaging (MRSI) a useful tool?: A preliminary study
    Amsellem-Ouazana, D
    Younes, P
    Conquy, S
    Peyromaure, M
    Flam, T
    Debré, B
    Zerbib, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (05) : 582 - 586
  • [2] Patients with a history of elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and negative transrectal US-guided quadrant or sextant biopsy results: Value of MR imaging
    Beyersdorff, D
    Taupitz, M
    Winkelmann, B
    Fischer, T
    Lenk, S
    Loening, SA
    Hamm, B
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (03) : 701 - 706
  • [3] Microvessel density in prostate carcinoma
    Bono, AV
    Celato, N
    Cova, V
    Salvadore, M
    Chinetti, S
    Novario, R
    [J]. PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2002, 5 (02) : 123 - 127
  • [4] Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
  • [5] Role of "saturation biopsy" in the detection of prostate cancer among difficult diagnostic cases
    Fleshner, N
    Klotz, L
    [J]. UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (01) : 93 - 97
  • [6] Prostate cancer:: Local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging -: Early experience
    Fütterer, JJ
    Heijmink, SWTPJ
    Scheenen, TWJ
    Jager, GJ
    Van de Kaa, CAH
    Witjes, JA
    Barentsz, JO
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2006, 238 (01) : 184 - 191
  • [7] Prostatic MR imaging - Accuracy in differentiating cancer from other prostatic disorders
    Ikonen, S
    Kivisaari, L
    Tervahartiala, P
    Vehmas, T
    Taari, K
    Rannikko, S
    [J]. ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2001, 42 (04) : 348 - 354
  • [8] LIANG KY, 1986, BIOMETRIKA, V73, P13, DOI 10.1093/biomet/73.1.13
  • [9] DETERMINATION OF PROSTATE VOLUME WITH TRANSRECTAL US FOR CANCER SCREENING .2. ACCURACY OF INVITRO AND INVIVO TECHNIQUES
    LITTRUP, PJ
    WILLIAMS, CR
    EGGLIN, TK
    KANE, RA
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [10] Comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging, guided prostate biopsy and digital rectal examination in the preoperative anatomical localization of prostate cancer
    Mullerad, M
    Hricak, H
    Kuroiwa, K
    Pucar, D
    Chen, HN
    Kattan, MW
    Scardino, PT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (06) : 2158 - 2163