Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy

被引:236
作者
Wong, Christina P. [1 ,2 ]
Jiang, Bo [1 ]
Kinzig, Ann P. [3 ]
Lee, Kai N. [4 ]
Ouyang, Zhiyun [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, State Key Lab Urban & Reg Ecol, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Sustainabil, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Sch Life Sci, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[4] David & Lucile Packard Fdn, Los Altos, CA 94022 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Ecological production functions; ecosystem management; ecosystem services; endpoints; environmental policy; sustainability; trade-offs; DECISION-MAKING; MANAGEMENT; NEED; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; METAANALYSIS; INDICATORS; CHALLENGES; TRADEOFFS; WATER;
D O I
10.1111/ele.12389
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Governments worldwide are recognising ecosystem services as an approach to address sustainability challenges. Decision-makers need credible and legitimate measurements of ecosystem services to evaluate decisions for trade-offs to make wise choices. Managers lack these measurements because of a data gap linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services. The dominant method to address the data gap is benefit transfer using ecological data from one location to estimate ecosystem services at other locations with similar land cover. However, benefit transfer is only valid once the data gap is adequately resolved. Disciplinary frames separating ecology from economics and policy have resulted in confusion on concepts and methods preventing progress on the data gap. In this study, we present a 10-step approach to unify concepts, methods and data from the disparate disciplines to offer guidance on overcoming the data gap. We suggest: (1) estimate ecosystem characteristics using biophysical models, (2) identify final ecosystem services using endpoints and (3) connect them using ecological production functions to quantify biophysical trade-offs. The guidance is strategic for public policy because analysts need to be: (1) realistic when setting priorities, (2) attentive to timelines to acquire relevant data, given resources and (3) responsive to the needs of decision-makers.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 118
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, Federal Register, V77, P21162
  • [3] [Anonymous], ECOLOGICAL EC
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity
  • [5] A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation
    Bagstad, Kenneth J.
    Semmens, Darius J.
    Waage, Sissel
    Winthrop, Robert
    [J]. ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2013, 5 : E27 - E39
  • [6] Ecosystem services in environmental assessment - Help or hindrance?
    Baker, J.
    Sheate, W. R.
    Phillips, P.
    Eales, R.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT REVIEW, 2013, 40 : 3 - 13
  • [7] Valuing ecosystem services as productive inputs
    Barbier, Edward B.
    [J]. ECONOMIC POLICY, 2007, (49) : 178 - 229
  • [8] Beijing Water Authority (BWA), 2009, GREEN YONGD RIV CONS
  • [9] Multi-criteria validation of a precipitation-runoff model
    Beldring, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 257 (1-4) : 189 - 211
  • [10] Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    Gordon, Line J.
    [J]. ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2009, 12 (12) : 1394 - 1404